What You Will Not Hear About Iraq
IN FOCUS, 30 Aug 2010
Adil E. Shamoo – Foreign Policy in Focus
Iraq has between 25 and 50 percent unemployment, a dysfunctional parliament, rampant disease, an epidemic of mental illness, and sprawling slums. The killing of innocent people has become part of daily life. What a havoc the United States has wreaked in Iraq.
UN-HABITAT, an agency of the United Nations, recently published a 218-page report entitled State of the World’s Cities, 2010-2011. The report is full of statistics on the status of cities around the world and their demographics. It defines slum dwellers as those living in urban centers without one of the following: durable structures to protect them from climate, sufficient living area, sufficient access to water, access to sanitation facilities, and freedom from eviction.
Almost intentionally hidden in these statistics is one shocking fact about urban Iraqi populations. For the past few decades, prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, the percentage of the urban population living in slums in Iraq hovered just below 20 percent. Today, that percentage has risen to 53 percent: 11 million of the 19 million total urban dwellers. In the past decade, most countries have made progress toward reducing slum dwellers. But Iraq has gone rapidly and dangerously in the opposite direction.
According to the U.S. Census of 2000, 80 percent of the 285 million people living in the United States are urban dwellers. Those living in slums are well below 5 percent. If we translate the Iraqi statistic into the U.S. context, 121 million people in the United States would be living in slums.
If the United States had an unemployment rate of 25-50 percent and 121 million people living in slums, riots would ensue, the military would take over, and democracy would evaporate. So why are people in the United States not concerned and saddened by the conditions in Iraq? Because most people in the United States do not know what happened in Iraq and what is happening there now. Our government, including the current administration, looks the other way and perpetuates the myth that life has improved in post-invasion Iraq. Our major news media reinforces this message.
I had high hopes that the new administration would tell the truth to its citizens about why we invaded Iraq and what we are doing currently in the country. President Obama promised to move forward and not look to the past. However problematic this refusal to examine on the past — particularly for historians — the president should at least inform the U.S. public of the current conditions in Iraq. How else can we expect our government to formulate appropriate policy?
More extensive congressional hearings on Iraq might have allowed us to learn about the myths propagated about Iraq prior to the invasion and the extent of the damage and destruction our invasion brought on Iraq. We would have learned about the tremendous increase in urban poverty and the expansion of city slums. Such facts about the current conditions of Iraq would help U.S. citizens to better understand the impact of the quick U.S. withdraw and what are our moral responsibilities in Iraq should be.
_________________________
Adil E. Shamoo is a senior analyst at Foreign Policy In Focus, and a professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. He writes on ethics and public policy. He can be reached at: ashamoo@umaryland.edu.
GO TO ORIGINAL – FOREIGN POLICY IN FOCUS
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Adil,
If you were George W Bush or any of his business partners, you would be celbrating the fact that “everything is going according to plan”. You write as if to Bush, or his successor Obama, or Blair, Brown, Cameron, etc, the number of Iraqi dead, maimed, without a roof, without a job, hungry, etc, was going to make them unhappy.
They are all celebrating the millions they’ve made out of the human tragedy they created. Only a few days ago, I had and argument with very talented writer of novels, who talks all the time of the ravages of war in a way that you’d think he’s opposed to them. Well, why the argument? when we came to Iraq, he defended the war and said he was there for a couple of years and that we are doing a great job there.
Well, I’ll tell you what. This man was under contract with a security company and now, at 39 years of age, he doesn’t need to earn a leaving anymore !!!!!!
You “President Obama promised….” what does it matter what he promised???? politicians lie, because they have to say what the voter wants to hear and if someone reached the Presidency of a country, it only means that he is the best liar of all.
To show us how much he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, he announced he was ordering another 30,000 troops into Afhganistan!!!!! and he, like his predecessor, makes sure Bin Laden and his Taliban colleagues, receive a constant supply of weaoins an ammunition, to keep USA troops fighting, killing and dying.
Remember he has no option, as the biggest donors to his political party, are weapon manufacturers.
Alberto
Adil – Your information is necessary to continually remind us of the great crime which has taken place and continues against the nation of Iraq. While we remain disappointed by the lack of honorable leadership in the U.S. to address this inhumanity, we can not brush aside such important information merely on the basis of that disappointment of leadership. Instead, only through such constant reminders do we maintain our vigilance and do our part, however little or large it might be, to bring about a better social order.
Aloha
Poka Laenui