…Meanwhile, over in Ghana
AFRICA, 13 Sep 2010
Ghana maybe championed for its political stability, but life for the average Ghanaian is defined by crippling poverty.
Well, that was fast. One night of fanfare mixed with somber speeches about children, love, peace and the future, then a day later the proceedings were adjourned.
Of course, there was the expected promise, or ‘accomplishment,’ that Israeli and Palestinians would meet regularly to work towards a final peace agreement, and even ‘hopefulness’ that the follow-up meetings would produce results. Left unstated, however, was that neither side could conceivably sign an agreement to create the now reified ‘Palestinian State’ without a level of pressure which it was clear from President Obama’s words-or rather what he didn’t say-will not be forthcoming.
Back in the Holy Land, settlements continue expanding despite the soon to be ended-or-extended (does it really matter which?) ‘moratorium,’ while rockets and bullets fly in the West Bank and into Israel. To the East in Jordan, the government continues its crackdown on dissent, while to the Southwest, the Mubarak regime has determined that the newest threat to stability comes from the cacophonous sound of too many muezzins shouting the call to prayer ‘out of sync.’
The View From West Africa
It was fascinating to watch Mubarak, Abdullah, Netanyahu, and Abbas-a rogue’s gallery of oppressors and human rights violators if there ever was one-talk seriously about peace and protecting human and civil rights and expanding freedom while sitting a continent away from either Jerusalem or Washington, or in my case in Accra, Ghana, on the southern end of West Africa.
Here most people I meet have no more than passing interest, if that, for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. They have plenty of other issues to take up their time much closer to home.
Ghana is routinely touted as one of Africa’s “success stories” because of its political stability. Certainly the United States has invested a lot in this idea; the US Embassy complex rivals the Presidential Palace in size.
However a closer look at the economic statistics underlying that claim underscores what a miracle the country’s stability is, considering that Ghana ranked 152 out of 189 countries in the latest Human Development Report, poorer even than Yemen, the Sudan, Haiti and even violence torn Pakistan and the Congo.
Only Afghanistan and even more desperate sub-Saharan countries rank lower, this despite a strong base of natural resources (the country wasn’t known by Europeans as the Gold Coast for nothing) and agriculture, as well as recently discovered oil. As Forbes magazine recently commented, Ghana “shouldn’t be poor, but it is.”
Per capital income ranks at a deplorable (and for almost anyone who can read this article online, unimaginable) $621. Travelling around the city’s environs with an Egyptian friend, we couldn’t help remarking how much poorer Accra is than Cairo-Egypt ranks around forty places higher than Ghana on the Human Development Index, with traffic and pollution that in scale if not sheer size rival its long-lost sister city 4,200 kilometres to the northeast (in one of the most famous political marriages in African history, the first President of Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah, married an Egyptian, Fathia Nkrumah, to unify the north and sub-Saharan regions of the continent).
In the northern countryside people often live in huts and sleep with their livestock, while children walk around with distended stomachs (malnutrition is the greatest source of mortality for children) even though the land is fertile, in good measure because of the focus on growing for export and a mismanaged agricultural sector.
Not surprisingly, the IMF considers “Ghana’s problems are mostly homegrown.” To be sure its leaders, whether 18th century chiefs who expanded their wealth and power through selling fellow Africans into New World bondage, or the corrupt politicians of today, deserve their share of blame for Ghana’s current problems.
However it is the height of blindness and hypocrisy to declare that four centuries of slavery and colonialism, from which Europeans and the West more broadly benefited far more than local elites, are irrelevant. Further more it would be disingenuous to ignore the impact of decades of international loans that has bestowed a hard-to-service national debt that helps fuel the export of raw materials rather than developing indigenous industries that could create and keep more capital at home.
Certainly Ghanaians have very little, and deserve much more-although it’s worth noting that the carbon footprint of the average Accran is far closer to what is ecologically sustainable globally than that of the average Angelino, Londoner or Dabawi. But if Ghana needs significant economic and human development, how can that be achieved in a way that doesn’t produce far higher inequality and environmental degradation, as it has in so many other developing countries?
Therein lies the great problem facing the country. Ghana’s “success” is that despite its continued economic woes, it hasn’t become unstable, become a haven for extremists or turned anti-American. But it’s hard to say how long will Ghanaians remain quiescent in the face of such poverty when their country has so much potential.
________________________
Mark LeVine is a professor of history at UC Irvine and senior visiting researcher at the Centre for Middle Eastern Studies at Lund University in Sweden. His most recent books are Heavy Metal Islam (Random House) and Impossible Peace: Israel/Palestine Since 1989 (Zed Books).
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.