MINUSTAH In Haiti: Keeping the Peace, or Conspiring Against It?

LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN, 24 Oct 2011

Harvard School of Public Health – TRANSCEND Media Service

Harvard Group Publishes White Paper Reviewing  Human Rights Abuses Perpetrated by the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti; Calls for  MINUSTAH withdrawal. 

On Octo­ber 4th, 2011, Har­vard stu­dents as part of a group of Cana­dian and US human rights advo­cates, doc­tors, pub­lic health experts, and jour­nal­ists released an exten­sively researched white paper review­ing and eval­u­at­ing the record of the United Nations Sta­bi­liza­tion Mis­sion in Haiti (known by its French acronym,MINUSTAH) and rec­om­mend­ing the with­drawal of the force from Haiti. The white paper release comes at a time of height­ened scrutiny of MINUSTAH due to high pro­file human rights abuses and wide­spread anti‐MINUSTAH sen­ti­ment in Haiti. The United Nations Secu­rity Council’s meet­ing to renew MINUSTAH’s man­date for the next year is sched­uled for Octo­ber 15th, 2011.

The white paper describes the his­tor­i­cal and legal under­pin­nings of MINUSTAH’s man­date and its polit­i­cal con­text, while thor­oughly review­ing its human rights record since the 2010 earth­quake. Human rights vio­la­tions per­pe­trated by the force include sex­ual vio­lence, vio­lent responses to polit­i­cal protests, and the intro­duc­tion of cholera into Haiti fol­lowed by the fail­ure to accept respon­si­bil­ity or offer ade­quate resources for cholera treat­ment, pre­ven­tion, and com­pen­sa­tion to vic­tims’ families.

Beyond these direct abuses, MINUSTAH has also vio­lated its man­date through fail­ure to pro­tect the inter­nally dis­placed from forced evic­tions and gender‐based vio­lence, poor secu­rity coor­di­na­tion and lack of com­mu­ni­ca­tion with Hait­ian groups, and sub­ver­sion of demo­c­ra­tic processes by fail­ing to respond to sig­nif­i­cant irreg­u­lar­i­ties dur­ing the recent pres­i­den­tial elections.

Co‐author Deepa Pan­chang noted, “The white paper project emerged because our Hait­ian part­ners were angry and frus­trated with MINUSTAH’s wide­spread human rights vio­la­tions in Haiti, yet these vio­la­tions were not being doc­u­mented in a sys­tem­atic way and MINUSTAH was not being held account­able for them. Our goal for the white paper was to present an acces­si­ble and accu­rate report to influ­ence decision‐making going for­ward.” Pan­chang is an alumna of the Har­vard School of Pub­lic Health.

“The cholera epi­demic has been an entirely man­made and pre­ventable dis­as­ter for Haiti.

Espe­cially given the role of MINUSTAH in bring­ing this epi­demic to Haiti, the sig­nif­i­cant allo­ca­tion of fund­ing toMINUSTAH while the cholera response remains under­funded is prob­lem­atic to say the least,” co‐author Rishi Rat­tan of Physi­cians for Haiti added.

With this in mind, the white paper seeks to shed light on the cur­rent human rights abuses occur­ring at the hands of MINUSTAH and spark crit­i­cal debate about whether the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity can con­tinue to jus­tify the increas­ingly high human cost of the mission.

“With the con­tin­u­ous stream of human rights vio­la­tions attrib­uted to MINUSTAH, if the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity is seri­ous about help­ing Haiti they will decide that respect for Hait­ian sov­er­eignty and human rights is incom­pat­i­ble with an exten­sion of the force’s man­date,” said co‐author Kevin Edmonds, a doc­toral can­di­date at the Uni­ver­sity of Toronto.

Download the MINUSTAH White Paper

Go to Original – harvard.edu

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.