U.S. Military Unveils Heat Ray Weapon: ‘You’re Gonna Feel It’
MILITARISM, 19 Mar 2012
Paul Koring -The Globe and Mail
In the ‘War of the Worlds’ the Martians used them to incinerate pesky humans more than a century ago.
The Pentagon plans are more modest: crowd control of pesky humans.
Still, after more than a century, the ‘heat ray’ has made the leap from fiction to reality with the U.S. military demonstrating the so-called ‘goodbye effect’ of directing electromagnetic waves at people.
It delivers sudden, unbearable heat, like the invisible wave when a hot oven door is opened but far more powerful – an intense, enveloping but non-lethal blast.
“You’re not gonna see it, you’re not gonna hear it, you’re not gonna smell it: you’re gonna feel it,” said Marine Colonel Tracy Taffola, at the public unveiling of the quaintly-dubbed Active Denial System at the U.S. Marines base near Quantico, south of Washington, D.C.
From a kilometre away, the invisible, high-energy, beam, concentrated (just like the Martians did) by a big concave mirror mounted atop a military vehicle can blast a crowd. Instantly, everyone wants to be somewhere else. They flee. Hence the “goodbye effect.”
The Pentagon has been experimenting with killer beams for decades. A laser so powerful that it can destroy nuclear-tipped missiles shortly after launch has been mounted in a much-modified Boeing 747 and is being tested.
The heat ray on display this week is at the other end of the spectrum, at least in terms of impact. It’s the “safest non-lethal capability” developed to date, Col. Taffola said.
Various development versions of the heat ray have been tested for years. One was sent to Afghanistan – but never used – in 2010. Police departments have shown interest.
The demonstration was intended to allay fears about the heat ray. In thousands of tests on more than 700 volunteers, using varying power levels, only two injuries requiring hospital treatment have occurred, according to officials.
Unlike microwave in household ovens, which penetrate deeply, heating from within, the beam in the “active denial system” is of a frequency that is absorbed at the surface of the skin. So there’s an unbearable feeling of intense heat but no real danger.
No one discussed whether a little meddling with the frequencies could field a beam capable of frying crowds rather than dispersing them. Opponents of heat rays have already questioned whether those incapable of instant flight – the aged, infirm, pregnant – might suffer serious injury from prolonged exposure. Others have suggested that mass panic among those exposed to the unseen beam could result in trampling and mayhem.
Proponents claim the heat ray is safer, poses less risk and is more humane that other non-lethal means of crowd dispersal such as tear gas or pepper sprays.
Go to Original – theglobeandmail.com
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Here again, a new high-tech weapon. Why do they develop a new harmful instrument — modest, they say — one after another? One of the possible answers to that question is that they feel insecure constantly. How much do they have weapons with the cutting-edge technology? And still they need another new weapon; from nuclear weapons to F35 to the new heating ray weapon. They are afraid of people; from foreigners living in different cultures in remote countries to their fellow Americans living next door. So, they need various kinds of weapons; from weapons of mass distraction to weapons to suppress crowds.
But the truth in this context is that the main problem is NOT what weapons they should introduce. Their main problem is their psychology — “their sense of insecurity,” among others. They need to look within, not without. Peace, accordingly “sense of security” as well, begins within.
“The paradox about gathering external forms of security is that the larger the fortress you build, the more insecure you feel. Amassing security is like trying to prove yourself; if you proceed from a faulty assumption—that you are vulnerable – everything you do based on that assumption will only magnify your sense of risk. The more protection you have, the more protection you need.” (Cited from p. 193 of “Why Your Life Sucks” by Alan H. Cohen, published by Bantam Books, 2002/2005)
May peace be with you. May peace be with them.