U.N. Chief Opposes U.S. Military Support for Syrian “Rebels”

ANGLO AMERICA, MILITARISM, MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA, SYRIA IN CONTEXT, UNITED NATIONS, 17 Jun 2013

Eyder Peralta, NPR – TRANSCEND Media Service

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Friday [14 June 2013] that he opposes the U.S. decision to provide Syrian rebels with military support.

“The United Nations, and in particular I, have been making it consistently clear that providing arms to either side would not address this current situation,” Ban told reporters during a briefing. “There is no such military solution.”

Ban said the only solution that can solve the conflict “sustainably” is a political one that should be sought through a hoped-for U.S.-Russian brokered peace conference in Geneva.

“The military path points directly towards the further disintegration of the country, destabilization of the region and inflammation of religious and communal tensions,” Ban said.

While calling for the on-the-ground investigation to continue, Ban also cast some doubt over the United States’ claim that the regime of Bashar Assad had used chemical weapons against rebel forces. He said:

“… the validity of any information on the alleged use of chemical weapons cannot be ensured without convincing evidence of the chain-of-custody. That is why I continue to emphasize the need for an investigation on the ground in Syria that can collect its own samples and establish the facts. Our goal remains a fully independent and impartial inquiry. I have complete faith in the integrity and professionalism of Dr. Sellström and his team.

“The use of chemical weapons by any party would be a crime against humanity. Given the seriousness of the allegations and the potentially grave consequences, I again urge the Syrian Government to grant Dr. Sellström’s team the access we have long sought.”

Update at 1:19 p.m. ET. White House On Intelligence:

During a press briefing, Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes explained that the United States had a preliminary intelligence assessment in April that pointed toward chemical weapons use by the regime, but it did not have “a high confidence level.”

Over the intervening months that assessment firmed up. He said the U.S. pieced “reporting from individuals who were there on the ground,” “physiological samples,” “open source reporting from social media and other places” and “our own intelligence reporting” to increase its confidence level.

Rhodes said the use of chemical weapons violates “clear international norms.”

“This should be a red line to the international community generally,” he said.

Go to Original – npr.org

Share this article: email mastodon facebook 🔗 copy link

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.