El Salvador: Pardon Granted for One of 17 Women Jailed for Miscarriage, Accused of Homicide
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN, 26 Jan 2015
Danica Jorden – Upside Down World
 Photo Credit: Al Jazeera |
| 23 Jan 2015 – With one vote short of a majority, Guadalupe, a Salvadoran young woman who has already been in prison for more than 7 years on charges of aggravated homicide with respect to the death of the fetus she was carrying, was almost denied liberty, despite domestic and international outcry in her support. She is one of 17 women currently held behind bars in El Salvador who have been the subject of efforts both in and out of the country to release them. Of all the women held for the crime of murdering their newborns, these 17 were seen to have had sufficient proof of having unintentionally miscarried during their pregnancies and appeared to have had the best chances for official pardons and release from jail.In a surprise about face on Thursday, January 15th, 2015, what seemed to have been a sure thing almost turned out very differently. As reported in El Salvador daily Contrapunto, members of the country’s conservative Arena party abstained from voting and a majority in favor of the pardon could not be reached. Only 42 votes were counted in favor, one short of the necessary 43 to constitute a simple majority. [1]Deputies belonging to the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) requested a revote because so many were absent, and on Wednesday, January 21st, 2015, the pardon was finally granted. “Ultimately, in the case of the accused [Guadalupe] there exist legal reasons that justify the favour of granting her a pardon,” reads the decision. [2]
Guadalupe had been previously sentenced to 30 years for the alleged murder of her newborn in 2007, when she was just 18 years old. Already a mother of one, she was in the house where she worked as a domestic employee when she began to hemorrhage and experienced a stillbirth. Her employers brought her to a public hospital still bleeding heavily, where medical personnel reported her to the police. According to Una flor por las 17 (A Flower for the 17), an organization dedicated to pardons for all the women, Guadalupe’s pregnancy was the result of rape, and she did not gain weight or realize she was pregnant. Furthermore, “The autopsy revealed a congenital anomaly in an umbilical artery and two umbilical veins, an anomaly frequently associated with spontaneous fetal death, but the pathologist did not explain what effect this anomaly could have in the death of the infant.”[3] FMLN deputy Lorena Peña points out that Guadalupe was not accused of committing abortion, for which the penalty is 12 years, time which the legislator maintains has already been served, but murder, which carries a far longer penalty. Peña accused the courts of “targeting” poor women like Guadalupe, instead of seeking out corrupt officials and drug traffickers. In a January 16th message on the social media platform Twitter, Peña decried the actions of the conservative Arena and PCN parties. Referring to another pardon that day, she notes, “A kidnapper, yes. Will a woman of limited means always be scorned by these two parties?”[4] In their study entitled “From Hospital to Prison,” the Agrupación Ciudadana por la Despenalización del Aborto (Civic Association for the Decriminalization of Abortion) recorded that 129 women had been tried between 2000-2011, with 49 found guilty. Three quarters of them were under the age of 25. In most of the cases, the Prosecutor first accused them of abortion, and later changed the charge to homicide, which carries a stiffer sentence.[5] But pardon was denied on Friday for a second woman, Cinthia, who gave birth alone to an infant she says had its cord wrapped around its neck. Among the reasons cited in the decision was that Cinthia smoked and drank beer on a daily basis. Cinthia, like Guadalupe, was also 18 when she miscarried, was likewise found guilty of aggravated homicide and has been serving the same 30-year sentence. She has completed 6 years, “despite the fact that the court did not present direct proof that she wanted to cause the newborn’s death,” contends Dennis Muñoz, one of the attorneys presenting the 17 requests for pardon. “Sentences and reports based on sexist stereotypes are a constant. They give abundant reasons such as that the mother should have shown maternal instinct. On the other hand, they never cite the risks one can assume that a woman faces when giving birth without assistance,” Muñoz decries. In Guadalupe’s case, the report remarked how she exhibited good conduct, completed various training courses and took part in religious activities. [6] NOTES: [1] Morán, Gloria y Arbaiza, Gerardo. “Diputados niegan indulto a una de las 17.” (16/01/2015). ContraPunto. URL: http://www.contrapunto.com.sv/reportajes/diputados-niegan-indulto-a-una-de-las-17 [2] “Asamblea concede indulto a Carmen Guadalupe Vasquez Aldana.” (22/01/2015). Voces. URL: http://voces.org.sv/2015/01/22/asamblea-concede-indulto-a-carmen-guadalupe-vasquez-aldana/ [3] “Una Flor por las 17: La historia de Guadelupe.” (16/01/2015). Las 17. URL: http://www.las17.org/34-la-historia-de-guadalupe [4] Lorena Peña. @lorenapeam. Twitter. URL: https://twitter.com/lorenagpeam [5] Agrupación Ciudadana por la Despenalización del Aborto Terapéutico Ético y Eugenésico. URL: http://agrupacionciudadana.org/ [6] Fernández, June. “El Salvador indulta a una de la 17 mujeres en prisión acusadas de homicidio por aborto.” El Diario. (22/01/2015). URL: http://www.eldiario.es/desalambre/Salvador-conceder-prision-acusadas-homicidio_0_348565152.html ______________________________ Danica Jorden is a writer and translator of Spanish, Portuguese, French and Italian. |
Go to Original – upsidedownworld.org
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Read more
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: