‘Blood on Your Hands’: EU Defends Training for Myanmar/Burma Police Force
EUROPE, 16 Mar 2015
Laignee Barron – Myanmar Times
11 Mar 2015 – The European Union last night defended itself against allegations of complicity in police brutality following a violent crackdown on students in Bago Region, saying it was not responsible for “decisions on the ground”.
It also called for a formal investigation into the violence at Letpadan, which the government says resulted in the arrest of 127 people.
The EU has been training Myanmar’s police in crowd management and riot control since 2013, reportedly following a request from opposition leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi as well as the government. The course included the provision of riot control gear.
The EU said that turning the batons on students was not part of the training.
“The fundamental purpose of the training is to increase the respect of human rights, stress the importance of negotiation and – only as a last resort – consider the use of proportional force,” the statement said.
While condemning the actions of police, the EU defended its training program. “This was needed, and as events show, this need still remains,” the statement said. “Whilst training can be given, the EU cannot make decisions on the ground.”
Anger at the EU delegation due to its Myanmar Police Force training programs began on March 6, a day after a standoff between students and police ended in violent clashes at Letpadan.
In response, activists set up camp near the EU delegation’s Yangon headquarters bearing placards condemning its cooperation with the police.
The EU responded with a statement on its Facebook page, but this only provoked further criticism in the comments section, with some posting pictures of students being attacked.
“Shame on you, EU, being fall into the trap and lies of so called reformed government in Myanmar,” said one Facebook user, Lin Zaw.
Thurein Linn wrote, “Hey EU, the blood of students and people that shed today is totally on your hands!”
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.