Singapore Family Feud
ASIA--PACIFIC, 18 Apr 2016
The Wall Street Journal – TRANSCEND Media Service
The city-state’s reputation for meritocracy comes under attack from an unexpected source.
11 Apr 2016 – Singapore’s self-image as a meritocracy has come under attack on social media from an unexpected source: former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew’s daughter. Posting on Facebook, neurosurgeon Lee Wei Ling accused her brother, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, of having “no qualms abusing his power to [have] a commemoration just one year after LKY died.” She continued, “If the power that be wants to establish a dynasty, LKY’s daughter will not allow LKY’s name to be sullied by a dishonorable son.”
Prime Minister Lee answered on Facebook hours later that, “The accusations are completely untrue.” Meanwhile, the state-controlled media have published accusations against Ms. Lee.
The family feud started when Ms. Lee submitted to the Straits Times newspaper an opinion article that objected to “hero worship” of her father on the first anniversary of his death. Editors there made cuts that Ms. Lee found objectionable, and she withdrew the piece.
Ms. Lee then posted the article on Facebook with the complaint that over a decade of writing a weekly column for the newspaper she was censored by three successive editors on sensitive topics. “I will no longer write for [Singapore Press Holdings] as the editors there do not allow me freedom of speech,” she insisted.
Janadas Devan, one of Ms. Lee’s previous editors and the son of former President Devan Nair, fired back that Ms. Lee was edited, not censored, because her articles were “like sailing through fog.” Ivan Fernandez, her current editor, accused her of plagiarism, a charge she denies.
On Sunday Ms. Lee posted on Facebook email correspondence with Mr. Fernandez that included the accusation of dynasty-building by her brother. Later that day the material was taken down. Prime Minister Lee’s Facebook response stated, “Meritocracy is a fundamental value of our society, and neither I, the [People’s Action Party], nor the Singapore public would tolerate any such attempt.”
Singapore’s leaders have a long record of successfully suing individuals and publications that accuse them of cronyism or nepotism. In 2013 the government extended its censorship rules to include online publications. Last month a court convicted Japanese-Australian editor Ai Takagi of sedition after her website carried four articles that the prosecution said “promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different groups of people in Singapore.”
hough Ms. Takagi apologized “for the harm I have caused through my actions,” pleaded guilty to sedition and is pregnant, she was sentenced to 10 months in prison.
The Prime Minister now faces an awkward decision of whether to take legal recourse against his sister, a former head of the National Neuroscience Institute, since clemency could be construed as favoritism. He and his father always maintained that libel lawsuits are necessary to protect the reputations of the country’s leaders.Meanwhile, Ms. Lee’s rejected article has started a useful debate over the proliferation of fawning tributes to the late Prime Minister and his legacy of punishing those who disagreed with the government.
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.