Huge Wall Built In Munich ‘to Protect Families’ from Refugees Who Will Live Next Door
EUROPE, 28 Nov 2016
The Mercury – TRANSCEND Media Service
16 Nov 2016 – A WALL that will tower more than 3.8 metres is being built in Munich after locals raised fears young refugees would be moving into the area.
According to The Sun, the barrier – which is higher than the Berlin Wall – is being built in Neuperlach Süd to separate the current community from the 160 unaccompanied young migrants moving to a nearby shelter.
Locals who campaigned for the wall argued that the values of their home would decrease if the refugees remained in the area for an extended period of time.
They also raised concerns about the noise and behaviour of the refugees.
The Berlin Wall, which stood at 3.5 metres, is smaller than the new wall and it’s still unclear how far the almost-completed structure will be.
A local judge of the Administrative Court in Munich permitted the wall, saying the new arrivals should not be able to use the wall for “ball throwing games” or other “leisure use”, local news Merkur reported.
While the wall has been used an example of how Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel’s refugee policy is not working, the structure is not supported by the entire community.
Deputy District chairman Guido Bucholtz said: “I was frightened when I saw this monster of a wall.”
The wall will reportedly be covered in vines after it is completed.
One couple told local media: “Donald Trump wants to build a wall for Mexico, and we in Munich Neuperlachbuild one to keep up safe from refugees.”
Merkel recently admitted that Germany may have failed with its open-door immigration policy, saying: “If I could, I would go back in time to be better prepared for the refugee crisis in 2015, for which we were rather unprepared.”
Concerns have also been raised that some asylum seekers who escaped their war-torn countries were returning to their homes for a holiday, despite claiming they needed to flee persecution.
Germany has accepted more than 1.3 million asylum seekers but has sought to reconsider its policy around migration.
Go to Original – themercury.com.au
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.