Ukraine: Still Divided and Tense
TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 6 Feb 2017
Rene Wadlow – TRANSCEND Media Service
4 Feb 2017 – The start of 2017 has seen an increase in military action and tensions in the separatist areas of Ukraine, especially in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions and around the city of Avdiyivka. There has been high-caliber artillery fire along with small arms and mortars. There had already been a sharp increase throughout the spring and summer of 2016, with an average of 1000 exchanges a day, as monitored by the some 1,100 staff members of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) posted to the area. The Secretary-General of the OSCE, Lamberto Zannier, has recently called for respect of a cease-fire already negotiated through the OSCE’s Minsk group.
The possibility of a new “Cold War” with its military buildup, lack of cooperation, and the stilling of opposition voices is real. The politically divided and potentially more violent Ukraine highlights broad social, economic and geopolitical orientations that will have long-range consequences. The current situation in Ukraine and Crimea does not led itself to calm considerations or compromises.
The OSCE has tried to develop conflict-reduction steps in addition to monitoring the situation on the ground. The Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights has tried to promote dialogue between Russian and Ukrainian civil society groups; the OSCE Coordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings has tried to raise awareness of local authorities about the threat of human trafficking in eastern Ukraine especially among internally displaced persons, and the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities has organized an expert discussion on minorities’ linguistic rights.
However, we are still far from a satisfactory resolution of the conflict and the political tensions between Russia, Ukraine, and the NATO alliance. Western economic sanctions against Russia are still in place, harmful to the Russian economy but not harmful enough to modify Russian policy. The Western economic sanctions still operatives were followed by Russian economic sanctions on European Union food products causing difficulties for EU agricultural production.
There is a need to move beyond the current deadlocked and tense situation. Ukraine faces real internal problems: political, economic, and social. There is a need for dialogue, trust-building, and reconciliation within the country – all stepping stones to stable internal peace. There is also need for de-escalation of international tensions.
At the start of the armed conflict, on 17 April 2014, there was a one-day negotiation in Geneva between the US Secretary of State John Kerry and the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. The Association of World Citizens proposed to them a federal-decentralized government for Ukraine that would not divide the country on the pattern of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia or Transnistra in Moldova but would foster local and regional autonomy. At a press conference following the Geneva meeting Sergey Lavrov said that the Ukrainian crisis must be resolved by the Ukrainians themselves and that they should “start a nationwide national dialogue within the framework of the constitutional process which must be inclusive and accountable.”
The Association of World Citizens proposal warned against simplified concepts in the Ukraine discussion. Federalism is not the first step to the disintegration of the Ukraine. But federalism is not a “magic solution” either. Since the Geneva meeting there has been a certain degree of decentralization but not a real federal structure. There has been a proclamation of a Donetsk People’s Republic and a Luhansk People’s Republic.
Those of us outside the Ukraine must help facilitate discussions of national governmental structures for the Ukraine and regional security cooperation so that common interests may be found and current tensions reduced.
_____________________________________
René Wadlow, a member of the Fellowship of Reconciliation and of its Task Force on the Middle East, is president and U.N. representative (Geneva) of the Association of World Citizens and editor of Transnational Perspectives. He is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace, Development and Environment.
This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 6 Feb 2017.
Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Ukraine: Still Divided and Tense, is included. Thank you.
If you enjoyed this article, please donate to TMS to join the growing list of TMS Supporters.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
You wrote that “Western economic sanctions against Russia are still in place, harmful to the Russian economy but not harmful enough to modify Russian policy.” How do you know that the sanctions have not modified Russian policy? It sounds like you would advocate for more sanctions in order to get Russia to do what? Surrender Crimea? Accept Ukraine into NATO? Over-throw the Putin administration? None of those are likely no matter what sanctions are imposed, not even in the context of overt war with NATO. You also should consider what might Russia have done if there were no sanctions? For example, annex Lugansk and Donetsk as they have requested, or make a formal defense alliance with them. Or actively destabilize wobbly NATO nations like Greece, Italy, Turkey. In my opinion, NATO and the US, perhaps in the context of the UN or the Hague, should bring criminal charges against their employees who engineered the fall of the Ukrainian government, and then those nations should pay reparations to Ukraine for the damage they have done to the nation and its economy by their own wayward employees. Of course, that will never happen, but in world response to law, it would happen. In the meantime, NATO nations should attend to their own national interests first, just as Trump advocates for the US. I do not believe there is a single EU or NATO nation that benefits economically by the crisis in Ukraine, nor will benefit if there is a war in Europe.