Jan Oberg’s Prime Minister Speech on the Corona Crisis
TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 4 Jan 2021
Jan Oberg, Ph.D. | The Transnational – TRANSCEND Media Service
Or your government leader’s Coronavirus speech that was never given.
Do not believe the future will be better before you hear leaders say something like this…
The speech can be seen as part of TFF’s Campaign “Convert Military Expenditures to Global Problem-Solving”.
January 1, 2021
See and listen to the speech by clicking on Vimeo above, or read the transcript below.
Fellow Citizens, good evening
Tonight, I want to share with you the main lessons my government and I have drawn from the Coronavirus crisis – a crisis which has caused so much suffering and so many deaths. And a crisis that will take very long time for our economy to recover from.
That lesson – and my central message to you tonight – is that your suffering has been caused by our failed security policies. Only, secondarily, is this a crisis of our health system.
Therefore, I want to extend my most profound apology to each and everyone of you in our country on behalf of my government.
The pandemic as well as other purely civilian crises had been predicted. But we ignored the warnings. We now recognise our full responsibility and hope for your understanding and forgiveness.
So how could this pandemic take us by surprise? How could we be so unprepared?
First of all, let me say:
The main – only – reason for our Covid-19 policy failure is that we have been obsessively focused on purely military means for our so-called ”national security.” We’ve allocated literally all the resources (that is, your tax money) to the military sector – so much so that our society became highly militarized but also more and more vulnerable and indefensible. That was not the right way to spend your tax money. And not the right way to honour your trust in us!
Over time, we were blinded by arms production and export profit interests of tiny but powerful elites. We chose to listen only to advisers who were, in reality, not objective but repeatedly advocated higher military expenditures because it benefited themselves. We were also influenced by powerful lobbying groups. We chose to listen to other kinds of expertise.
In the process we created enemies and invented threats to be able to always justify these new weapons and higher military expenditures. But, in reality, we were our own worst enemies.
Because . . . if weapons could bring peace, we would today have a wonderful peaceful world with vision and optimism. We all know that we do not live in such a world.
The fact is that this government – also I myself – gave speeches about human security and common security and peace but never asked ourselves what those words meant. As a result, militarist thinking and the Military-Industrial Complex has become an unbearable burden on our civil economy and all of society. In addition, it threatens our democracy and our wellbeing as we have just seen in this crisis.
We cannot ourselves be safe with others if they do not feel safe with us. Self-defence is right and in accordance with international law; but having long-ranger offensive weapons that automatically threatens somebody far away can only lead to arms races, never bring peace, only endless war.
What we need now instead is confidence-building – bridges – not confrontation-building and walls. We need to build peace first and then secure it. Because it’s a proven fact that the present security thinking will never bring peace to the world.
Secondly…
Under my leadership, the government shall move away from the military-dominated security policies and give priority to human and common security for all.
Therefore, we have now established a national high-level and very broad-based Future Peace and Security Commission. It’s mandate is to – as quickly as possible – develop a strategy and a concrete three-years plan for a fundamental change in our defence, security and foreign policy.
This new policy shall, above all, allocate resources to provide human security in a wide sense, including protecting citizens’ lives, a first-class health care system, civil defence, storing the resources and goods needed during emergencies and prepare society’s various authorities to serve you, the citizens, in times of crises.
This new strategy called”Peace First” shall adapt our capacities and institutions to strictly adhere to the UN Charter – because all UN members – also our country – have signed that Charter and it states that ”peace shall be created by peaceful means” (Article 1).
We, the member states, must not continue to ignore international law.
Fellow citizens!
Someone has to take the first steps and we will. We’ll get nowhere if every country waits for someone else to take the first step. We will take it and thereby invite a much-needed snowball effect.
We shall then free resources – in fact billions upon billions of dollars – and re-allocate them to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). We have human rights but we also have duties and one of them is to reduce suffering! There is no reason that people shall go hungry to bed.
Third – and finally: What will this mean for our country?
You can expect a reduction of our military expenditure by 50% within these three years and a conversion of industrial, administrative, scientific and other resources to boost civilian human security.
It is a safe strategy. No one will take advantage of our military reduction. Instead, the countries we have characterised as enemies will be grateful to no longer feel targeted by us and thereby we open up for cooperation instead of confrontation. Security with, not against, each other.
This also means that my government shall work for the abolition of nuclear weapons. For the first time in the nuclear age, we now have a legally binding Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty that is ratified by over 50 governments around the world and aims at total nuclear abolition.
This is civilisational progress and we want our country to be among the pioneers of that desired nuclear-free and much safer world.
You may now ask: What about our country’s highly qualified military personnel? Here is my answer: Some will continue in their present roles while we transform our national defence forces to a purely defensive mode. Others will be transferred to new civilian security sectors. I want to assure you that no one will lose her or his employment but many will change jobs so their competence, skills and experience serve all society and not just a few.
That’s common sense too for two reasons. This policy will be a boost to our economy – secondly, I am sure that no human being wants to be employed to plan – ultimately – death and destruction if there are better alternatives for the common good. And of course there are!
My government and I have drawn the main lesson from the terrible Coronavirus: We abandoned you, the people, when you most needed us and it must never happen again.
My apology would, however, be empty words if we did not make concrete changes in the wake of what we have seen worldwide in 2020. The Corona crisis is an opportunity to learn important lessons about our failed security thinking and to do things right in the future.
So, we look forward to working with you all – in our own country and worldwide – to realize the only vision that truly matters now: To reduce the violence against other people, other cultures and against Mother Nature and create peace in diversity . . . peaceful coexistence.
The world’s multi-crises call for determined action now – no more piecemeal politics and muddling through. We know that tomorrow will be decided by the choices we make – or dont make – today. We must rise over petty differences and pull together. Our common interests on this planet are much stronger than our small differences.
Humanity is faced with an existential choice now: It’s either continued violence and no existence or co-operation and peaceful co-existence.
The sooner we make that right choice, the easier it will be to save humanity from impending catastrophes.
Thank you very much for your attention! I won’t ask God to bless you or our country. Instead, let’s bless each other as peacemakers.
Thank you!
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Can you give more information. like what is his name and what country? Very impressive.
Dear Diane Perlman
Thanks for your interest. I’ve been in the peace and future research milieus since about the mid-1970s and a co-founder of TFF that started operating 35 years ago. In Sweden. As a matter of fact, virtually everything you might want to know about me is available on the links provided above. In addition, I have a personal blog at
https://janoberg.me/
– and I am also an art photographer at:
https://obergphotographics.com/
For peace research issues: oberg@transnational.org
For art: jan@obergphotographics.com
I have visited your homepage and seen that we share a number of interests. I’d be happy to connect with you where you want. You may also like to receive TFF PressInfo – a weekly newsletter about what we publish. My best – Jan Oberg
[…] Jan Oberg’s Prime Minister Speech on the Corona Crisis […]
Dear Prof. Jan Oberg, Prime Minister of a country of peace in diversity,
Thank you very much for your wonderful speech. Very impressive for me, too. You took the words right out of my mouth, to use the expression I learnt when I was in junior high school. Also your speech reminds me of “The Apology of Socrates.” The way you use the word ‘apology’ is just like that. Yes, I must admit that the enemy is in me. I will try to say what I feel using words and expressions so precisely as you do here.
Akifumi Fujita from Japan
Dear Akifumi Fujita
Many thanks for your fine appreciation of my speech. If you have good words in your mouth – spit them ut at the right time and place, please, in the future 🤗
Let me say that I do not think the enemy is within you. It is more in the collective us that speaks on the basis of a society that has gone completely astray and has, step-by-step, decided to make power, including violent power, a sort of God. I know that systems consist of people, but they consist of so much more – so please think in terms of systems, ways of thinking and do not blame yourself – of which I am sure, there is no reason.
My best
Jan