As Executives Hike Prices, US Corporations Rake in Biggest Profits Since 1950

CAPITALISM, 6 Dec 2021

Jake Johnson | Common Dreams - TRANSCEND Media Service

“Prices are high,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown, “because corporations are raising them—so they can keep paying themselves with ever-larger executive bonuses and stock buybacks.”

Consumers shop in a Target store on September 28, 2021 in Miami, Florida.
(Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

30 Nov 2021 – New data released by the Commerce Department shows that over the last two quarters of 2021, U.S. corporations outside the finance sector have raked in their largest profits since 1950—a windfall that belies CEO gripes about rising labor costs and broader inflationary pressures in the economy.

“Let’s be clear. The problem is not the worker who got a small raise and a $1,400 check seven months ago.”

The Commerce Department figures, as Bloomberg reported Tuesday, show that overall corporate profits were up 37% from the previous year while employee compensation was up just 12%.

“Let’s be clear. The problem is not the worker who got a small raise and a $1,400 check seven months ago,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), chair of the Senate Budget Committee, tweeted in response to the data. “The problem is corporations making record-breaking profits while 700 billionaires became $2 trillion richer during the pandemic.”

“We need an economy that works for all,” Sanders added, “not the 1%.”

In recent months, a number of major U.S. companies including Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Chipotle, and Dollar Tree have announced price hikes amid the coronavirus pandemic, claiming that the increases were made necessary by forces driving inflationary pressures in the U.S. and abroad.

But observers have pointed to corporations’ record profits—as well as sky-high CEO pay—to argue that recent price hikes should be seen as an effort to pass higher labor and material costs onto consumers in order to further pad already-strong bottom lines.

In June, Chipotle—which handed its CEO a $24 million raise last year—said it hiked menu prices by around 4% to cover the costs of modest wage increases for employees, fueling the false narrative that worker pay raises are to blame for recent price jumps. Last week, Dollar Tree CEO Michael Witynski—who made around $11 million in total compensation last year—pointed to the current “inflationary environment” to justify bumping store prices up to $1.25.

As Bloomberg noted Tuesday, “U.S. consumer prices rose 6.2% in the 12 months through October, the most since 1990.” But, the outlet added, “the new data on corporate earnings suggest business can comfortably pass on all its higher costs.”

During a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) argued that “prices are high because corporations are raising them—so they can keep paying themselves with ever-larger executive bonuses and stock buybacks.”

“Corporations could lower their prices,” Brown, the chair of the committee, said during his opening statement at the hearing. “Executives could get a slightly smaller pay bump this year and stock buyback plans could be put on hold, instead of raising costs for customers. There’s no inexorable law that says profits for those at the top must continue to rise in perpetuity, even at the expense of everyone and everything else in the economy.”

“Corporations can get away with it,” he added, “because they have too much power in the economy.”

_______________________________________________

 

Jake Johnson is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

 

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Go to Original – commondreams.org


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.