A Flawed Peace Conference Offers a Radical Proposal: Hope
CONFLICT RESOLUTION - MEDIATION, 8 Jul 2024
Haggai Matar | +972 Magazine – TRANSCEND Media Service
Israeli-Palestinian peace conference in the Menora Arena calling for an end to the war and a solution to the conflict, Tel Aviv, 1 Jul 2024. (Oren Ziv)
In a context of fear, hatred, and violence, an Israeli-Palestinian gathering that seemed detached from reality actually represented something revolutionary.
4 Jul 2024 – At first glance, the Israeli-Palestinian peace conference in Tel Aviv on July 1 appeared detached, almost delusional. And in some ways, it was.
With around 6,000 attendees, the event was the country’s largest anti-war gathering since October 7, outside of street protests. As they filed into the Menora Arena, giant screens displayed a video from 2019 about a group of musicians from the southern city of Sderot who teamed up with a group in Gaza to create a joint music and dance video. As if to further emphasize the stark distance between that time and our current one, it was immediately followed by a segment from John Lennon’s song “Imagine.”
This idyllic atmosphere inside the stadium was shattered by the first group of speakers to take the stage: Jewish and Palestinian citizens of Israel, whose family members were killed or kidnapped in the Hamas-led attack nine months ago, or killed in Israel’s ensuing bombardment of Gaza. One speaker, Liat Atzili, was herself kidnapped and held captive until late November.
Listening to each speaker’s personal horror stories felt like being punched in the stomach over and over again. There was hardly a dry eye in the audience — especially when they collectively read the poem “Revenge” by the late Palestinian poet Taha Muhammad Ali, as a collective stand against retribution. In between such stories, in what felt like an unbridgeable emotional leap, peace anthems were sung throughout the event, including the uplifting “Today,” “The Prayer of the Mothers” and “Song for Peace” — forever associated with the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin — which were met with festive applause and enthusiastic dancing.
It was difficult to reconcile the dissonance between these moments of jubilation with the reality outside. Israel’s onslaught has killed nearly 40,000 Palestinians, obliterated the entire Gaza Strip, forced hundreds of thousands to live in tents without food, and thrown thousands of others into prison camps under conditions of torture and abuse. Meanwhile, since the October 7 attack that killed around 1,200 Israelis, tens of thousands more remain displaced from their homes in the north and south of the country, and the fate of the remaining hostages suffering in captivity continues to preoccupy everyone’s minds.
Adding to all this, while the crowd in the stadium was dancing, the Israeli army ordered thousands in the city of Khan Younis to flee ahead of yet another ground incursion. None of the speakers addressed these developing events, and much less was said about the horrors of the war than one would expect.
The dissonance was further exacerbated by the absence of any real solutions to the enormous problems facing Israeli and Palestinian societies today. Many of the speakers demanded an immediate ceasefire and a hostage-prisoner exchange, some vaguely mentioned a “political settlement,” and a few spoke of “two states.” But for three hours, not one of the dozens of speakers outlined a concrete plan for the “peace camp” that this event was meant to revive. (Peace activists Maoz Inon and Aziz Abu Sarah, among the initiators of the conference, promised that they are working on a detailed outline which will be published soon.)
Pragmatically-speaking, any large Israeli mobilization for peace must inevitably account for security needs, and this is a debate that we must continue to develop on the left. But nobody at the conference suggested how to deal with the challenges of Hamas and Hezbollah beyond the short term, nor the growing illegitimacy of the Palestinian Authority among Palestinians — very real and pressing issues for many Israelis.
For the most part, the Israeli left’s best answer is that these threats will disappear when the occupation ends and a peace deal is reached. But this doesn’t quell the existential fears of most Israelis, who are still traumatized by October 7 and fear that it could happen again. In the absence of such answers, it will be difficult to offer an alternative to the right wing’s absolute hegemony in Israeli politics.
‘Hope as a verb’
Yet despite all this, there is another way to understand this event. Along with the war, there is a social and emotional context in which the conference was organized: a society mired in fear, hatred, despair, racism, and cruelty.
Israelis are faced with a political landscape in which there is almost wall-to-wall denial — from Itamar Ben Gvir to Yair Lapid — of the need for a political agreement, for justice for Palestinians, and for substantive Jewish-Arab partnership. We are dealing with a mainstream media that for years has tried to conceal the occupation and siege from the Israeli public, and now hides the truth about the horrific war crimes Israel is committing in Gaza and in its detention facilities, while silencing every critical voice for peace and justice.
Even the peace conference barely received a mention in the local media; the only item offered on a TV news show ran clips from the October 7 attack while interviewing a conference speaker, as if to tell viewers who these leftists want to make peace with.
Because of this, a gathering that might have come across as detached, and where seemingly banal declarations were repeated for hours, actually represented something revolutionary.
The event brought together Jewish and Palestinian survivors, displaced persons, hostages, former prisoners, bereaved families, activists, security officials, religious and cultural figures, intellectuals, and current and former parliamentarians to echo a common commitment to justice, nonviolence, partnership, equality, democracy, self-determination, security, freedom, and peace for all who live between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. It was a radical proposal for hope.
As Maoz Inon said on the stage that night, hope is not something that simply exists or that you find, but rather should be understood “as a verb.” In the current context, where public discourse is suffused with genocidal speech, reaffirming our shared fundamental values and rebuilding a sense of community are vital and urgent rituals.
Without a horizon that sees there are two peoples who will forever live together in this land, and that life together is possible, it will be impossible to build an alternative movement to the prevailing currents of ultra-nationalism. Without consensus on these basic values, it will be impossible to propose sustainable solutions that will benefit both peoples.
But even on the political level, there were some important moments at the conference. Several Palestinians who took to the stage spoke about the Nakba and its personal significance — how members of their extended families were displaced to Gaza in 1948, and how those very same relatives were now being killed by Israeli bombs. This connection of the Palestinian people in all its parts, across borders, is rarely grasped by Jewish-Israeli society, and there is value in bringing it into focus. The insistence on equal treatment of all those living between the river and the sea is also a positive development in the broader leftist discourse in Israel.
Two videos screened at the event showed how hope can be translated from an abstract message into concrete steps. The first featured Palestinian activists and organizations in the occupied territories working against apartheid alongside Israeli groups committed to equality and peace. The second highlighted a series of bloody conflicts — South Africa, Northern Ireland, Rwanda, and between Israel and Egypt — in which ending oppression and injustice, and striving for reconciliation, helped bring those conflicts to an end.
Imagining a future
To even begin discussing the future, it is essential to first stop the war, the destruction, and the captivity. But for the peace camp to amass the power and influence necessary to bring about real change in Israel-Palestine, there is still a long road ahead, with many obstacles along the way.
Developing a detailed plan for how security and equality can be offered to both peoples is one challenge. The large gap between the significant Palestinian presence on stage, and the small number of Palestinians in the audience, also signals a problem that the movement must urgently address (Inon and Abu Sarah promise that there will be future events in the occupied West Bank as well).
Only four sitting Knesset members attended the event (Ayman Odeh, Ofer Cassif, Naama Lazimi, and Gilad Kariv), while Yair Golan, the leader of the new merger between the Labor and Meretz parties called “The Democrats,” was absent; it showed how far this camp is from the corridors of power.
A moving speech by the Palestinian writer Muhammad Ali Taha, which was full of humor and compassion but sharp in its criticism of both Israel and Hamas, captured the essence of what the conference seeks to re-activate. He spoke of the horrors of the current war, the principles of a political solution, and a distant imagined future where both nations play football, listen to music, and celebrate life “in West Jerusalem, the capital of Israel, and in East Al-Quds, the capital of Palestine, as well as Tel Aviv, Ramallah, Beer Sheva, and Gaza.”
Taha may be a dreamer, but in the words of Lennon, and as the conference shows, he is not the only one.
______________________________________
Haggai Matar is an Israeli journalist and political activist. Matar is the executive director of “972 – Advancement of Citizen Journalism,” the nonprofit that publishes +972 Magazine. He previously served as co-founding editor of Local Call, the Hebrew-language news site co-published with Just Vision. Read his Hebrew blog on Local Call.
Tags: Anglo America, Colonialism, Conflict Resolution, Crimes against Humanity, Ecocide, Ethnic Cleansing, Famine, Gaza, Genocide, Genocide Convention, Hamas, Hunger, International Court of Justice ICJ, International Criminal Court ICC, Israel, Israeli Apartheid, Israeli occupation, Massacre, Palestine, Protests, Rafah, Students Anti-Genocide Gaza, USA, United Nations, War crimes, West Bank, Zionism
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.
Read more
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
CONFLICT RESOLUTION - MEDIATION: