Israel: It’s Time for All of Us to Divest

PALESTINE - ISRAEL, 5 Aug 2024

Scott Plous | The Progressive – TRANSCEND Media Service

2024 Gaza Solidarity Encampment at Brown University – Divest, don’t arrest.
Wikimedia Commons

You may be profiting financially from the war in Gaza. It’s easier than you think to change that.

29 Jul 2024 – On October 7, 2023, Hamas fired at least 3,000 rockets into Israel and ordered thousands of men to breach Israel’s borders in a surprise attack. The immediate result is now well-known: the death of roughly 1,200 people and kidnapping of approximately 240 hostages.

What’s less well known is that defense industry stocks soared after the attack, adding $23 billion in market capitalization by October 9 and making quite a bit of money for shareholders—including U.S. colleges and universities with investments in companies that have supplied Israel with weapons, some of which have allegedly been used to commit war crimes documented by the United Nations Human Rights Council.

In response to the escalating death toll and humanitarian crisis in Gaza, thousands of student protesters around the world have joined in expressing a common message: We do not want our school to support or profit financially from this war. Instead, they’ve called on their schools to divest any holdings in companies supporting the war or occupation.

As I’ve written elsewhere, this call makes sense—not because divestment will end the war or put companies out of business, but because the call successfully draws attention to humanitarian concerns, and because it’s aligned with the values that schools typically teach, including respect for the law, human rights, social justice, and the exercise of free speech.

But if it’s wrong for schools to profit financially from the war in Gaza, it’s also wrong for individuals to profit from it. Unfortunately, many people do exactly that without realizing it. For instance, employees and retirees often have retirement accounts with mutual funds that include stock in companies such as Boeing, General Dynamics, and Lockheed Martin, all of which make weapons used in Gaza.

If you would like to divest from military contractors that may be involved in war crimes, the safest way to do so is by asking your employer, financial planner, or tax adviser what environmental, social, and governance (ESG) alternatives are available, and then assess the pros and cons of each option in light of your retirement goals. In my case, I have a few different retirement accounts, each containing mutual funds, so I simply changed my fund choices from traditional mutual funds to ESG mutual funds.

I began this act of personal divestment by moving an individual retirement account (IRA) and a Roth IRA from the Vanguard 500 Index Fund (my original choice, ticker code VFIAX) to Vanguard’s Social Index Fund (VFTAX), which has a comparable annual return.

To make the switch, I just called Vanguard customer service and requested the change. Ten minutes later, I was done.

I did much the same thing with some employer-backed retirement accounts, but because this company didn’t offer the specific ESG fund I wanted, a customer service representative had me open “brokerage windows” to convert those accounts (a slightly cumbersome process, but not difficult).

None of these changes incurred fees or taxes. I should also add that it’s easy to convert non-retirement mutual funds to ESG mutual funds, but non-retirement conversions may trigger capital gains taxes.

When choosing ESG mutual funds, one tool I found especially useful was the website WeaponFreeFunds.org, which hosts a searchable database that scores thousands of mutual funds, shows the performance of each fund, and provides information on hundreds of military contractors so that investors can avoid mutual funds that hold stock in companies of concern. The website also lists top-scoring mutual funds, and it provides scores on several other ESG criteria, such as fossil fuels, gender equality, and guns (one benefit of ESG funds is that they tend to be relatively climate-friendly).

To illustrate, the website gave my original Vanguard 500 Index fund a grade of D because 3.13 percent ($9.16 billion) of the fund is invested in twenty military contractors that make cluster munitions, landmines, white phosphorus, nuclear arms, and many of the weapons used in Gaza. In contrast, Vanguard’s ESG Social Index Fund received a grade of A because none of its investments include companies that make weapons.

An article in The Lancet recently estimated that the direct and indirect death toll of the war in Gaza stands at around 186,000 lives—about 8 percent of the total population of Gaza. Put another way, a United Nations Development Program report said the conflict has already reduced average life expectancy in occupied Palestinian territory by seven years.

If you regard the idea of profiting from this tragedy as unbearable, I hope you’ll consider divesting any holdings you have in the companies fueling it. And for readers who don’t have retirement or investment accounts, I hope you’ll share this commentary with those who do. The time has come to divest.

____________________________________________

Join the BDS-BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, SANCTIONS campaign to protest the Israeli barbaric siege of Gaza, illegal occupation of the Palestine nation’s territory, the apartheid wall, its inhuman and degrading treatment of the Palestinian people, and the more than 7,000 Palestinian men, women, elderly and children arbitrarily locked up in Israeli prisons.

DON’T BUY PRODUCTS WHOSE BARCODE STARTS WITH 729, which indicates that it is produced in Israel. DO YOUR PART! MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

7 2 9: BOYCOTT FOR JUSTICE!

Share this article: email mastodon facebook 🔗 copy link

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

There are no comments so far.