Configuring the Paradoxical Insights of 48-fold and 100-fold Sets of Koans

TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 30 Dec 2024

Anthony Judge | Laetus in Praesens - TRANSCEND Media Service

AI-Assisted Clarification of Cognitive Challenge of Fundamentally Elusive Metaphors

Introduction

30 Dec 2024 – With completion of the UN’s recent Summit of the Future — and adoption of a Pact for the Future and a Declaration for Future Generations — there is a fundamental challenge to how to engage with such comprehensive documents. Crucial is the question who will be motivated to do so and what they may be able to conclude from such complex articulations. Curiously the Pact for the Future also framed a Global Digital Compact, seen as a framework for constraining future use of artificial intelligence — presented as a major threat to humanity. Ironically it is only AI which now has the capacity and patience to peruse such documents (and the lengthy supportive presentations of 193 government representatives at the Summit) in order to configure their insights meaningfully and comprehensibly.

As a consequence, the UN’s ambition to “turbocharge” the Sustainable Development Goals on the occasion of the Summit of the Future was previously explored through a series of interactions with AI (Turbocharging SDGs by Activating Global Cycles in a 64-fold 3D Array, 2024). The exploration with AI enabled the Pact for the Future, the Declaration for Future Generations, and the Global Digital Compact to be analyzed in terms of the connectives they failed to use, with the implications for future governance (Analysis by AI of Reports of UN Debate on Artificial intelligence, 2024).

Distinct from such current secular initiatives, upheld by the international community as “pivotal” for humanity at this time, are the various traditional arrays of wisdom in the form of folktales and other particular compilations (Collective insight from traditional folk tales and fairy tales, 2022; Educational fables for faith-based global governance, 2006). One example is the set of 147 Delphic Maxims (Delphic Maxims for Modern Followers, Hellenion; Philip Chrysopoulos, The 147 Commandments Gods gave to Ancient Greeks, Greek Reporter, 3 September 2024). Other examples are offered by the compilations of 48 or 100 Zen Buddhist koans, the ordered formulations of various religions, or secular collections (Maxime Lagacé, 75 Words of Wisdom from the Best Minds (Ever)). Somewhat ironically, the Wit and Wisdom of the United Nations (1961) has also taken the form of a much-neglected compilation.

Curiously the times are also witness to a vast proliferation of insights and articulations with every focus. Every problem and possibility evokes a multiplicity of studies and commentaries — exemplified by the role of social media and the opportunities it offers for many. The situation could be caricatured as a “feeding frenzy” in information terms — or as a frantic quest for “wisdom”. Any possible form of coherence is then of necessity called into question by that dynamic.

In contrast to any sequential listing of traditional arrays of “wisdom”, typically unordered, the question is whether they invite comprehension otherwise — as patterns of some kind (Coherent Reconciliation of Eastern and Western Patterns of Logic, 2023). Arguably they may merit recognition as a complement to efforts to order secular formulations of strategic initiatives as discussed separately (Comprehensible Organization of Strategic Complexity in 3D and 4D, 2024).

Metaphorically the challenge could be understood as the quest for a kind of Rosetta Stone enabling a form of “translation” between distinctive cognitive modalities — variously understood to be incommensurate or mutually irrelevant. Such a configuration has been previously explored in the light of that metaphor (Memorable Packing of Global Strategies in a Polyhedral Rosetta Stone, 2023). More generally the challenge could be understood as a more fruitful configuration of categories of strategic relevance, in the light of previous explorations (Functional Classification in an Integrative Matrix of Human Preoccupations, 1982; Interactive Polyhedral Configuration of Preoccupations, 2023).

Those exercises envisaged mapping such strategic articulations onto polyhedra such as the truncated tesseract — susceptible to visualization in 3D. The 64-fold pattern of vertices of that polyhedra — of potential significance from other perspectives — is associated with a 48-fold pattern of faces and a set of 112 edges. That evokes the question as to whether the set of 48-koans might be appropriately associated with those faces as a complement to the set of vertices. Configuring such contrasting cognitive artifacts within a common framework would then evoke the question of a higher order as to whether the paradoxical challenges of the koans enables comprehension of the strategic challenge in a cognitively more fruitful manner (Visualizing the Coherent Configuration of Incommensurable Cognitive Modalities, 2024)..

As with the articulation and configuration of the 64-fold “strategic” pattern, the following exercise makes particular use of AI to resolve some of the challenges and explore the possibility of interesting solutions — but with a focus on the cognitive paradoxes as potentially framed or implicit in the 64-fold frame. The focus on koans derived from an earlier exercise to render more accessible such elusive insights (Configuring a Set of Zen Koan as a Wisdom Container: formatting the Gateless Gate for Twitter, 2012). Speculatively it can be asked whether the metaphor of a Rosetta Stone implies the need for a form of “cognitive container” — as yet to be designed — for indications of “wisdom” and “cognitive fusion” (Polyhedral containers for metaphorical morphing complexes, 2014; Complementarity and Self-Reflexivity: between nuclear fusion and cognitive fusion, 2006).

The responses to the earlier exchange included the implication that AI might well be able to offer significant insights into the transitions between logic, emotion, spirituality, and action — to the pathways between them — and the manner in which each was potentially able to “trump” the other (Comprehending Connectivity between Logic, Emotion, Intuition and Practice, 2024). The main outcome of the following interaction with AI is an interlinked configuration of 48 koans mapped onto an interactive truncated cuboctahedron.– with specific links to more extensive descriptions of each koan. Animations of a configuration of 100 koans are presented, together with that of the secondary complement of 52 koans.

As in the previous experiments, the responses of ChatGPT 4o are distinctively presented below in grayed areas, with those of Claude 3.5 (in some cases). Given the length of the document to which the exchange gives rise, the form of presentation has itself been treated as an experiment — in anticipation of the future implication of AI into research documents. Web technology now enables the whole document to be held as a single “page” with only the “questions” to AI rendered immediately visible — a facility developed in this case with the assistance of both ChatGPT and Claude 3 (but not operational in PDF variants of the page, in contrast with the original). Reservations and commentary on the process of interaction with AI to that end have been discussed separately (Methodological comment on experimental use of AI, 2024). Whilst the presentation of responses of two AIs could be readily considered excessive, it offers a “stereoscopic” perspective highlighting the strengths and limitations of each.

TO CONTINUE READING Go to Original – laetusinpraesens.org

Share this article: email mastodon facebook 🔗 copy link

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

There are no comments so far.