Architectura Socio-Ecologika: Evidence Base
ECONOMICS, 6 Jan 2025
Koenraad Priels – TRANSCEND Media Service
24 Dec 2024
-
Empirical evidence of systemic fraud and deception
Professor Richard Werner’s 2014 paper “Can banks individually create money out of nothing?” serves as crucial evidence of systemic fraud in banking:
Historic Breakthrough
This research provides, for the first time in history, empirical evidence that individual banks can create money out of nothing. It refutes two dominant banking theories:
- The financial intermediation theory (banks are merely intermediaries)
- The fractional reserve theory (banks can only create money collectively)
Empirical Evidence
Methodology
- An empirical test involving borrowing money from a cooperating bank
- Internal bank data monitored during the credit process
- Specific observation of whether money was transferred from existing accounts or newly created
Conclusions
- Individual banks create money “like fairy dust” out of nothing
- This happens at the moment they extend credit
- No transfer of existing deposits is required
Implications
This evidence has far-reaching consequences:
- It demonstrates how banks mislead society about their true function
- It undermines the legitimacy of interest payments on credit
- It proves the current system is based on systematic misrepresentation
- This paper thus forms crucial legal evidence for the systemic fraud inherent in the current banking system, and could be used in court to demonstrate the fraudulent nature of the current financial system.
-
Evidence of science fraud with control systems engineering
The systemic fraud in the monetary system is proven by Gauvin and Dominguez’s formal stability analysis:
Gauvin, M., & Dominguez, S. (2020). A Systems Engineering Approach to Formal Monetary and Financial Stability Without the Vagaries of “Austerity.” MRC. MRC 2020 A systems approach to money_4122020 rev2_17.01.2021.pdf
Systemic Instability
Mathematical Proof
- Control systems engineering demonstrates that the current monetary system is inherently unstable
- The analysis proves that debts inevitably grow to infinity when principal or interest cannot be repaid
- The system is designed for extortion, political control and mathematical failure
Metrological Fraud
Fundamental Contradiction
- Money is simultaneously defined as a unit of measurement AND as a scarce commodity with variable value
- This is logically incoherent and constitutes a false money paradigm
- This misrepresentation violates fundamental scientific principles for metrology
Systematic Deception
Institutional Impact
- The system forces infinite growth within finite planetary boundaries
- ca. €15 trillion in unnecessary interest payments are legitimized
- 3.3 billion people live in countries spending more on interest than on education
- This scientific analysis proves that the current monetary system is based on systematic fraud and misrepresentation, with catastrophic consequences for humanity and the planet.
-
Consequences of systemic criminality and liability
The systemic criminality in our current financial and economic systems leads to severe human rights violations:
Direct Human Impact
Loss of Life and Wellbeing
- 3.3 billion people live in countries spending more on interest payments than on education
- 10,000 people (including 5,000 children) die daily from effects of dirty water
- Farmers commit suicide due to unpayable compound interest debts
Systematic Exploitation
- Women and girls perform 12.5 billion hours of unpaid care work daily without which humanity cannot survive
- Half the world’s population exists on less than $5.50 per day
- 860 million people try to survive on $1.80 per day
Systemic Violence
Economic Warfare
- Systematic value-extraction through interest-bearing debt systems
- Quadrillion dollar casino of derivatives threatening global stability
- Expropriation of local resources in poor countries
Institutional Complicity
- Banks create money “like fairy dust” while charging interest on it
- Regulators actively facilitate ecocidal and genocidal systems
- Bureaucratic structures function at kindergarten level during escalating polycrisis
Criminal Liability
Corporate Responsibility
- Corporations are programmed for systematic value extraction
- They force infinite growth within finite planetary boundaries
- Active participation in maintaining destructive economic structures
Individual Liability
- Decision makers in financial institutions enabling systemic fraud
- Regulators failing their mandated responsibility for system transformation
- Politicians legitimizing demonstrably harmful economic structures
- The combination of psychopathic corporate structures and infantile government oversight creates a perfect storm of human rights violations with catastrophic consequences for humanity and the planet.
-
Raising awareness and presenting a way forward to escape from an escalating polycrisis
Priels, K. (2023). Ending the Global Kleptocracy: Financial Innovation for the 21st Century. Journal of Critical Realism in Socio-Economics (JOCRISE), 2(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.21111/jocrise.v2i1.49
Systemic Financial Fraud
Core Mechanisms
- Banks create money “like fairy dust” out of nothing while charging compound interest
- The monetary system is based on a fundamental misrepresentation of money as both measure and commodity
- This creates a global Ponzi scheme requiring perpetual growth within finite planetary boundaries
Escalating Polycrisis
Socio-Ecological Impact
- The system forces exponential growth while already exceeding Earth’s regenerative capacity by 70%
- 3.3 billion people live in countries spending more on interest than education
- Women and girls perform 12.5 billion hours of unpaid care work daily
Systemic Violence
- The financial architecture systematically concentrates wealth with the top 10%
- Creates a two-class society with an exploitative monetized minority
- Forces infinite growth on a finite planet, making collapse inevitable
Institutional Complicity
Regulatory Failure
- Government agencies and regulators actively facilitate ecocidal systems
- Bureaucratic structures function at kindergarten level during escalating crises
- Politicians legitimize demonstrably harmful economic structures
Path Forward
Systemic Transformation
- Replace the current banking system with passive, interest-free mutual credit
- Abolish wealth extraction through financialization
- Limit property rights to what is reasonable and equitable
- Develop socio-ecological intelligence as a species
- The current financial architecture constitutes the fundamental driver of an escalating polycrisis that threatens human survival. Without radical transformation of these fraudulent structures, sustainable development and global wellbeing remain impossible
-
Conclusion: we can build a strong legal case against the global banking system through multiple lines of evidence
Based on the available evidence, we can build a strong legal case against the global banking system through multiple lines of evidence:
Scientific Evidence
Control Systems Analysis
The mathematical proof using control systems engineering demonstrates that the current monetary system is inherently unstable and designed to fail, showing that:
- Debts inevitably grow to infinity when principal or interest cannot be repaid
- The system forces infinite growth within finite planetary boundaries
- There is a fundamental logical contradiction in defining money simultaneously as a measure and commodity
Banking Evidence
Werner’s Empirical Research
Professor Richard Werner’s groundbreaking research provides concrete evidence that:
- Individual banks create money “out of nothing”
- This happens at the moment they extend credit
- No transfer of existing deposits is required
Documented Regulatory Failures
Recent cases demonstrate systematic failures in banking oversight:
- Banks have been sued for weak safeguards and inaction on fraudulent incidents resulting in millions in consumer losses
- Financial institutions have failed to adequately investigate fraud complaints or comply with legal reimbursement mandates
- Banks have demonstrated “wilful blind-eye knowledge of the obvious” in facilitating fraudulent transactions
Legal Framework
Accountability Standards
The legal framework for holding banks accountable includes:
- Banks have both ethical and legal responsibilities to prevent fraudulent behavior
- Victims must have the right to sue banks to recover losses as both restitution and deterrence
- Financial institutions can be held liable for failing to question suspicious payments that a “reasonably skilful and careful banker” would have probed
Building the Case
Strategic Approach
To strengthen the legal position:
- Document systematic patterns of regulatory violations
- Gather evidence of banks’ failure to implement adequate consumer safeguards
- Demonstrate the mathematical impossibility of the current system’s sustainability
- Show direct links between banking practices and human rights violations
- The combination of scientific proof of systemic instability, empirical evidence of fraudulent money creation practices, documented regulatory violations, and measurable human rights impacts creates a compelling legal case that should stand up to scrutiny in court.
_________________________________________________________
Koenraad Priels is an independent researcher from Belgium.
Tags: Banking, Banksters, Corruption, Economics, Finance, Justice, Money, Money laundering
This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 6 Jan 2025.
Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Architectura Socio-Ecologika: Evidence Base, is included. Thank you.
If you enjoyed this article, please donate to TMS to join the growing list of TMS Supporters.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.