US Capitalism just Got a Black Eye

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-AI, 3 Feb 2025

Robert Reich – TRANSCEND Media Service

27 Jan 2025 – The Story behind Today’s Stock Market Tank

I thought you’d like to know why the stock market tanked this morning.

Late last week, a little-known Chinese artificial intelligence start-up called DeepSeek revealed that it had come up with more advanced AI than America’s Big Tech companies, and at a tiny fraction of the cost — even without access to America’s advanced chip technology.

To add insult to injury, DeepSeek has made its technology “open source” — that is, available to everyone.

The lesson here is that Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Google became too big, fat, and musclebound to remain sufficiently innovative. Instead of out-of-the-box invention, they specialized in marginal improvements.

By contrast, Chinese tech corporations compete fiercely with each other. This has put them on the cutting edge — and is why China has been able to come up with startling innovations (not only in AI but in electric vehicles, batteries, even TikTok, and much more).

China’s secret sauce hasn’t been big subsidies from the Chinese government creating giant “national champions.” It’s been intense competition.

Lina Khan, Biden’s chair of the Federal Trade Commission — who sued Big Tech for monopolizing the market — correctly pointed out last March that the United States could not stay on the cutting edge by relying on giant “national champions.”

These days, the “national champions” argument often gets made in the context of our dominant tech firms. We often hear that pursuing antitrust cases against or regulating these firms will weaken American innovation and cede the global stage to China. These conversations often assume a Cold War-like arms race, with each country’s firms in a zero-sum quest for dominance…

History and experience show that lumbering monopolies mired in red tape and bureaucratic inertia cannot deliver the breakthrough technological advancements that hungry startups tend to create. It is precisely these breakthroughs that have allowed America to harness cutting-edge technologies and have made our economy the envy of the world. To stay ahead globally, we don’t need to protect our monopolies from innovation—we need to protect innovation from our monopolies. We need to choose competition over national champions.

So what happened to the stock market this morning?

Much of its recent valuation has been based on gigantic bets on artificial intelligence — in which big tech has been investing hundreds of billions of dollars in data centers and energy capacity it assumed it needed to get to the next generation of AI.

Wrong.

The US is going to have to rethink our entire approach to technology. We may also have to rethink our approach to capitalism.

_______________________________________________

Robert Reich is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center. He served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written 17 other books, including the best sellers Aftershock, The Work of Nations, Beyond Outrage, Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few and The Common Good. His new book, The System: Who Rigged It, How We Fix It, is out now.  He is a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, founder of Inequality Media, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentaries Inequality for All, streaming on YouTube, and Saving Capitalism, now streaming on Netflix. robertreich.substack.com

Go to Original – robertreich.substack.com

Share this article: email mastodon facebook 🔗 copy link

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

There are no comments so far.