Journalism 101 – How to Avoid Being a Propaganda Tool
MEDIA, 20 Jun 2011
Leslie Griffith - Reader Supported News
How to avoid being a propaganda tool in one easy step.
CNN propagated what appears to have become a massive disinformation campaign to drum up support for war, reporting Gaddhafi loyalists were using Viagra for mass rape.
It’s been a long, slow slide for CNN. The once-proud cable news pioneer has consistently crawled under the media’s lowering bar, but this week it blazed a new trail to the bottom.
In at least one glaring example this week, the CNN editorial staff threw out the basics of textbook journalism in favor of racy innuendo. I don’t blame reporters, I blame their bosses who don’t insist on responsible reporting.
Reporters are pressured to find “edgy” and “sexy” stories to fill the never-ending news cycle. So, reporters make compromises. This week’s most glaring compromise involved two things Americans like to talk about more than just about anything else – Viagra and Sex. I could shout “Viva Viagra” in an attempt to lighten things up a bit … but this story has far-reaching ramifications. It’s no laughing matter.
Here’s a quote from Russ Baker, reporter and editor of the investigative website whowhatwhy.com:
“Last week at WhoWhatWhy we put out an important story about what’s going unreported concerning the bombing of Libya. Now, our concern is about what is being reported. We’re amassing indications that the Libya mass rape story being used to drum up support among NATO allies for continued bombing … may be false. In other words, part of an intense disinformation campaign. And one that is working, with the BBC the latest to buy into it.”
Now we get CNN’s titillating installment, which involves an alleged cell-phone video of a Libyan woman being sexually abused by alleged Gaddhafi loyalists and, for good measure, complete with all the repulsive details and heart-breaking screams. But this is where we have to pay close attention … because the reporter told us in the content of the story that it could actually be nothing more than planted propaganda.
She cautions: “We’ve been unable to verify its authenticity. We don’t know where it was taken, or when, or by whom.”
What? Did we read that right?
In any responsible newsroom, that alone is reason enough not to publish the story or run the video. Without confirmation and without knowing where and from whom it came, it is little more than a baseless story with no attribution. In fact, after running the story, CNN is in danger of propagating what appears to have become a massive disinformation campaign to drum up support for a war. And that’s why reporters and editors always ask for multiple sources, direct attribution and some concrete evidence that the story is indeed based in fact. This is chapter one in any journalist’s textbook. It keeps reporters from becoming little more than mouthpieces or stenographers and, Murrow forbid, from reporting lies.
But this is how most news organizations operate today. They rush to out-titillate the competition without checking the facts and before considering whether or not they’ve been manipulated … and their eye-catching story simply planted.
Obviously, “We the people” need to buy newsroom bean counters a set of journalism textbooks, perhaps highlighting the chapter on how to avoid becoming a tool.
____________________
Leslie Griffith has been a television anchor, foreign correspondent and an investigative reporter in newspaper, radio and television for over 25 years. Among her many achievements are two Edward R Murrow Awards, nine Emmies, 37 Emmy Nominations, a National Emmy nomination for writing, and more than a dozen other awards for journalism. To contact Leslie, go to lesliegriffith.org.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
Go to Original – readersupportednews.org
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.