Diesel Spilled in the Arctic Continues Its Advance to the Sea
ENVIRONMENT, 22 Jun 2020
teleSUR - TRANSCEND Media Service
9 Jun 2020 –This accident is comparable to the “Exxon Valdez” tanker spill that occurred three decades ago.
Diesel spill in the Ambarnaya River moving into the Pyasino glacial lake, Russia, June 8, 2020. | Photo: Twitter/ @Naveed_kachala
Diesel spilled on May 29 at a Norilsk thermoelectric station in the Arctic Circle continues to move towards the sea, despite attempts by Russian authorities to control the catastrophe.
“The fuel arrived at Pyasino, a magnificent lake about 70 kilometers in diameter with lots of fish and a good biosphere. But now it is impossible to predict how it will support this load,” said Krasnoyarsk Governor Alexandr Uss.
The Ambarnaya River, one of those polluted by the accident, empties into the Pyasino glacial lake, from which the Pyasina River originates, which in turn empties into the Kara Sea.
As a result of the spill, some 21,000 tons of diesel fuel contaminated the surrounding lands and rivers. According to Greenpeace, this accident in the Arctic is comparable to the “Exxon Valdez” tanker spill that occurred three decades ago off the coast of Alaska.
Russia’s Emergencies Deputy Minister Alexandr Chuprian stated that 40 floating barriers have been installed to contain the advance of diesel as much as possible, although he admitted that they will not completely stop the contamination.
“The barriers are physical objects for containment… It is naïve to say that they are absolutely hermetic. Even for a schoolchild, it is clear that there is no effective way to stop the contamination,” Chuprian said.
Russia declares #NationalEmergency: melting permafrost – or frozen ground – has led to a massive #OilSpill in Arctic rivers, staining them a bloody red. Permafrost covers 65% of Russia, making its structures vulnerable in the face of global warming.https://t.co/aBntjkHqDT
— Earth.Org (@EarthOrg) June 9, 2020
The Krasnoyarsk Region’s Environment Vice Minister Yulia Gumeniuk reported that the contamination had advanced beyond floating barriers and also admitted that “they are not an effective means of stopping the contamination.”
A week after the accident, investigations by the local Environmental Ministry show that hydrocarbon concentrations exceed 1,100 times the maximum allowable norm in the Bezimianni stream, which is close to the thermoelectric power station.
Related: Arctic Melting Means Business Opportunities, Pompeo Foresees
So far, 673 people and 264 specialized teams, which are dealing with the environmental disaster, have removed 5,200 cubic meters of aqueous diesel suspension and 23,000 cubic meters of contaminated soil for further processing.
Uss denounced that during the first two days the representatives of the Norilsk company deliberately sought to misinform the authorities in order to “hide what happened or the magnitude of what happened.”
On June 3, Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed his discomfort that the government was not informed in due course of the accident. On May 31, his administration declared a federal state of emergency to ease the consequences of the ecological disaster.
Tags: Environment, Marine pollution, Oceans, Oil Spill, Pollution, Russia
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.