BATTLING CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS

COMMENTARY ARCHIVES, 16 Feb 2009

Ivan Eland

Africa was always the continent (one of the few) that even the usually interventionist U.S. national security analysts deemed as non-strategic to U.S. interests.  Not anymore.

The Pentagon’s new Africa Command bureaucracy, which was created largely to defend oil produced on the West African coast (itself a dubious objective), has already branched out to fight "the war on terror" elsewhere in Africa – with disastrous results.  

Typically, around the world, the United States needlessly makes enemies by training indigenous militaries to fight terrorist groups that didn’t focus their attacks on U.S. targets.  As a superpower, the U.S. hates "instability," no matter how far from U.S. territory or interests it develops. Thus, the U.S. military has been training the Ugandan military in counterterrorism.  

For more than a generation, the Ugandan military has been fighting a brutal Christian terrorist organization – the Lord’s Resistance Army (L.R.A.) – which originally wanted to overthrow the Ugandan government but now slaughters and maims people (for example, by cutting off their lips) in the name of fighting for the ten commandments.  Five years ago, the Ugandan army drove the L.R.A. into the remote Garamba National Park in the Congo, which is on the border of Uganda and Sudan.  

Recently, the Ugandan military asked for the Bush administration’s help in going into the Congo after these Christian terrorists (which I will deem "Christianists").  According to the New York Times, then-President George W. Bush, ironically an aggressively oriented Christian himself, approved U.S. military assistance to the Ugandan military to wipe out his violent religious brethren.  

The U.S. military helped plan and finance the Ugandan cross-border operation in cooperation with the Congolese government.  Unfortunately, the operation was bungled badly and as many as 900 innocent civilians paid the price with their lives.  Many more were maimed, raped, and had their villages razed.  

The botched U.S.-assisted Ugandan and Congolese invasion of the park allowed the L.R.A. Christianists escape routes and then did not guard nearby Congolese villages.  In response to the invasion, the Christianists went on a crusade, brutally sacking village after village in northeastern Congo.   

The Christianists burned villages, heinously murdered innocent Congolese civilians, and raped many women.  The Christian terrorists even tried to twist off the heads of small children and kidnapped older children to fight in the L.R.A.’s conscripted (slave) army.  Even worse, the Christianist forces have split up and remain on the rampage.  

If the definition of terrorism is killing innocent civilians for political gain, the Christian S.L.A. are clearly terrorists.  But what about the Bush administration’s actions?  The S.L.A. had been driven to a remote national park full of impenetrable swamps.  

President Bush then approved assisting and financing an eradication operation that had no direct relevance to U.S. national security interests and had substantial downside potential if the Ugandan and Congolese militaries – not renown for their competence – made a mess of the operation.  Human rights organizations have heaped scorn on the operation as needlessly poking a hornet’s nest.  

Even though President Bush didn’t intend to assist a foreign military incursion that resulted in substantial civilian deaths, isn’t he morally culpable for those deaths because he recklessly aided an operation unneeded to ensure U.S. security and with the tremendous risk of incompetent militaries generating a violent backlash from the Chrisianists with a botched operation?

The U.S. has similarly and ineptly increased the threat in another African country.  Islamist terrorists in Somalia, a moderate Muslim country, had no standing until the Bush administration began sponsoring corrupt, brutal, and unpopular warlords there.  

The Islamists then took over the country and their brief, less venal rule looked good compared to the prior situation and to the subsequent non-Islamic, U.S. encouraged and assisted foreign invasion of the country by Ethiopia.  After the Ethiopian withdrawal, the Islamists are back with a vengeance, even stronger than before because of ill-conceived U.S. meddling.  

The Bush administration should be held morally accountable for the deaths and mayhem caused by unneeded and counterproductive interference in the affairs of other nations. 

President Obama should learn from Bush’s mistakes and realize that unnecessarily intruding into other nations’ business, especially in an area such as Africa that is non-strategic to the United States, can have horrific, unintended ramifications.  Obama should scale back or stop U.S. intervention in the Uganda-Congo region and Somalia and stay out of Darfur, Sudan.

GO TO ORIGINAL – ANTIWAR.COM

Share this article: email mastodon facebook 🔗 copy link

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.