Bridging the Gap between Peacebuilders and Environmentalists

TMS PEACE JOURNALISM, 12 Jun 2023

Tia Savarese | Peace News Network – TRANSCEND Media Service

29 May 2023 – Conflict, environmental threats and disasters, climate change, and food insecurity are often considered separate issues with separate solutions. These issues are, in actuality, all directly related and it is essential to remove the divisions between these fields to collaboratively create solutions.

There is often a division between the environment, natural resource management, and climate, versus conflict and peacebuilding. According to Carl Bruch of the Environmental Law Institute, many peacebuilders have historically viewed environmental issues as an afterthought; to be considered after achieving peace. Similarly, many environmental workers fail to understand the nuances of conflict and peacebuilding. They seek to urgently pursue large-scale projects, such as those involving renewable energy, to combat carbon emissions. In many cases, they neglect to understand the potential negative impacts this could have on conflict-fragile countries completely reliant on fossil fuels.

Yet, this view has changed dramatically in recent years. The war in Ukraine has clearly shown the direct relationship between conflict and food security. The war constrained supply chains and exacerbated food inflation in developing countries. The global hunger crisis that resulted is further compounded by climate shocks that affect food distribution and transport, crop yields, and livestock.

Development and aid programs must work to incorporate thorough conflict analyses before conducting their work. According to Ted Holmquist of Mercy Corps, these analyses were originally seen as only conducted in the realm of the peacebuilding practitioner, but if food security and other development programs fail to understand the dynamics of a conflict, it can exacerbate tensions. For instance, if local communities perceive an aid program as being too closely linked to one side of the conflict, it can become mistrusted and eventually expelled. If food distribution programs are inequitable and fail to reach all communities, they can instigate divisions between communities. Aid programs must hire a balanced staff that represents the local population and incorporate community-based approaches. It can be quite difficult to meet these requirements during emergency situations, thus it is important to consider the minimum standards of participatory approaches and conflict analyses that are needed to promote peace.

Experts discussed these findings during the session “Breaking Barriers, Building Connections: How to Achieve Synergy Between the Fields of Peacebuilding, Climate Change, Environment, and Food Security,” during the 10th PeaceCon Conference held in Washington DC during May 3-5, 2023.

Panelists:

Carl Bruch, Environmental Law Institute
Ted Holmquist, Mercy Corps
Celestine Procter, Alliance for Peacebuilding

____________________________________________

Tia Savarese is a recent graduate of the George Washington University with a Bachelor of Arts in International Affairs with concentration in Conflict Resolution and Security Policy. She serves as the Commissioning Editor and Social Media Manager for Peace News Network while residing in Washington, DC. Before joining PNN, she interned for a communication firm, a think tank, and the US federal government.

Go to Original – peacenews.com

Share this article: email mastodon facebook 🔗 copy link

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.