We Have a Moral Obligation to Speak Out against Genocide
TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 7 Oct 2024
Maung Zarni | FORSEA – TRANSCEND Media Service
Dialogue with Prof. Alex Hinton, a leading anthropologist of genocides at Rutgers Univ.
30 Sep 2024 – “Speak out!” is the singularly most important message Professor Alex Hinton had to offer the world’s people, against the backdrop of the ongoing atrocity crimes, including genocides, being perpetrated by Israel, Myanmar’s military junta and the Arakan Army of Buddhist Rakhine, the anti-junta rebels in Western Myanmar and genocidal civil war in Sudan. In the late Spring this year, Professor Hinton sat down with FORSEA co-founder Dr Maung Zarni to share inter alia his social scientific understanding of Raphael Lemkin’s rich and multilayered conception of genocide.
Their 30-minutes conversation was filmed on the sidelines of the 1st international conference on the Cambodian genocide co-organized and co-hosted by the Prime Minister’s Office and the Documentation Center – Cambodia, a principal archival organization.
First, Alex the scholar.
Alex Hinton is an unassuming, very down-to-earth American scholar, who has published 16 scholarly books on genocide, mass violence and racism in his long and distinguished career. He directs the Center for the Study of Genocide and Human Rights and is UNESCO Chair on genocide prevention and Distinguished Professor of Anthropology at Rutgers University Newark. (See Alex’s most recent book It Can Happen Here: White Power and the Rising Threat of Genocide in the US, NYU Press, 2022).
In 2022, he took the expert witness stand to support the prosecution’s case against Brother Number Two at the Extraordinary Chambers of the Court of Cambodia (ECCC), or better known as the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. After 13 years in operation, punishing 3 senior genocidaires at the cost of $300 million, the tribunal came to a close. The noted American genocide scholar pointed out that that the tribunal did pass a judicial judgment that Khmer Rouge regime was guilty of genocide against two specific populations of Cambodia, the native-born Vietnamese and Cham Muslim groups.
His personal background would certainly have been a significant factor in his lifelong search for understanding why the genocidaires kill. Born in Palo Alto, Norther California, Alex grew up with a psychoanalyst father who, from his couch, cast his typical psychological gaze on Alex and siblings at home, he told me over a glass of beer at the hotel in Phnom Penh where we were both accommodated as guest speakers at the said conference.
His responses to my probing questions were eclectically drawn on psychoanalytical insights, Buddhist perspectives and a cultural Marxian intellectual tradition closely associated with the Frankfurt School. He listed and explained “drivers of genocide” (and other forms of premeditated mass violence), while situating such acts and processes of mass atrocities in the interface between political organizations (principally “states”) and ideological systems (organized religions, included) on the hand, and the common existential angst among millions of individuals regarding their need to belong or to fill their unbearable void of Being, on the other hand.
Rather helpfully, as well, Alex differentiated the legalist’s narrow reading of genocide as encoded as the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (or The Genocide Convention, in short), from Lemkin’s far-richer, original, grounded social scientific conception of genocide. He had written for the lay public on the poverty and “limits of international law”, especially as the genocide convention is widely regarded as a lamentable product of the Big Power politics which emerged after the World War II.
To make such a weak international law even less useful, the United Nations is not equipped with any enforcing mechanisms or power, independent of the fundamentally anti-democratic character of the 5-victorious founding states, the so-called Permanent Members of the Security Council.
There have been overwhelming votes in multiple resolutions at the United Nations, both at the Security Council and in the General Assembly, in support of a free state of Palestine.
In the face of such impotence of the UN organs and the international law, the world’s moral majority, be they on the streets or in the suites of the state organs, have found absolutely pathetic, utterly offensive, vile and shrill that Israel has continued to violate international law and any civilizational norms. It is beyond mad that this vile and Nazi Germany-like criminal state is armed, financed, and protected by other previously genocidal regimes of the West (led principally by USA, UK, Germany, and most member states of the European Union).
Therefore, beyond the limits of international law, Alex’s singular message – that “we have a moral obligation to speak out (against any genocide)” – will resonate widely with the moral majority in today’s world.
___________________________________________
A Buddhist humanist from Burma (Myanmar), Maung Zarni, nominated for the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize, is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment, former Visiting Lecturer with Harvard Medical School, specializing in racism and violence in Burma and Sri Lanka, and Non-resident Scholar in Genocide Studies with Documentation Center – Cambodia. Zarni is the co-founder of FORSEA, a grass-roots organization of Southeast Asian human rights defenders, coordinator for Strategic Affairs for Free Rohingya Coalition, and an adviser to the European Centre for the Study of Extremism, Cambridge. Zarni holds a PhD (U Wisconsin at Madison) and a MA (U California), and has held various teaching, research and visiting fellowships at the universities in Asia, Europe and USA including Oxford, LSE, UCL Institute of Education, National-Louis, Malaya, and Brunei. He is the recipient of the “Cultivation of Harmony” award from the Parliament of the World’s Religions (2015). His analyses have appeared in leading newspapers including the New York Times, The Guardian and the Times. Among his academic publications on Rohingya genocide are The Slow-Burning Genocide of Myanmar’s Rohingyas (Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal), An Evolution of Rohingya Persecution in Myanmar: From Strategic Embrace to Genocide, (Middle East Institute, American University), and Myanmar’s State-directed Persecution of Rohingyas and Other Muslims (Brown World Affairs Journal). He co-authored, with Natalie Brinham, Essays on Myanmar Genocide.
Tags: Burma/Myanmar, Cambodia, Gaza, Genocide, Genocide Convention, Genocide Studies, Israel, Palestine, South Sudan, Sudan, West Bank
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.