Trump Will Exploit Fear of Russia to Dominate Europe’s Security Policies, Says Academic Maung Zarni
EUROPE, 25 Nov 2024
Ahmet Gurhan Kartal | Anadolu Ajansi - TRANSCEND Media Service
‘US policy towards Europe will be anchored in the attempt to make Europeans feel insecure about Russia.’
- Trump will not pull out of NATO because ‘the American economy is also very much benefiting from massive military and war spending,’ says Zarni.
- Aligning with US support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza will cause ‘major internal societal upheavals’ in some European nations, warns activist.
18 Nov 2024 – US policies toward Europe under President-elect Donald Trump will aim to “continue to control, dictate and dominate European politics with respect to security,” according to a British academic and human rights activist.
“The new Trump administration is taking its gloves off,” Maung Zarni said in an interview with Anadolu.
“The US policy towards Europe will be anchored in the Americans’ attempt to make Europeans feel insecure about Russia.”
He said there is already a rising “sense of anxiety and insecurity” because Russia “has been made to look like a serious threat.”
The narrative propagated has been that Russian President Vladimir Putin “will invade and snatch European countries on the eastern side of Europe,” he said.
“So, that is the main driver,” added Zarni.
Will US pull out of NATO?
One of the main sources of tension between the Trump-led US and Europe could be the future of NATO.
Zarni pointed out that Trump, during his first term from 2017 to 2021, repeatedly threatened to abandon NATO, terming the alliance “obsolete.”
However, he believes that Trump’s posturing and threats have little substance.
“Trump’s rhetoric that he will dismantle NATO and let Putin do whatever he wants with Europe is really scaremongering, because the US, its economy and its influence has largely been based on the war machine,” said Zarni.
“In his first administration, Trump had to make repeated threats, preying on the European sense of insecurity without the American security umbrella.”
Neither of the EU’s two leading members, France and Germany, “feels capable of defending itself in the unlikely event of war with Russia,” he added.
He said the “American military establishment is too big for Trump and his advisors to come in and say: ‘We’re going to pull out of NATO, or we will dismantle NATO.”
“That’s not going to happen, because … the American economy is also very much benefiting from massive military and war spending, and so billions and billions of dollars have always come back to the US arms industry,” he asserted.
“It will be against the American interest to sever ties with NATO.”
Gaza genocide and ‘major internal societal upheavals’ in Europe
Zarni thinks that the situation in Gaza and the ongoing genocide by Israel will be a test for ties between the Trump administration and some European governments facing backlash from their own public.
“The conflict is going to be the reality that Israel is making on the ground by expansion of land, and now they’re officially, openly talking about annexing the West Bank,” he said.
“Trump, we have to remember, is also a businessman. His own family, his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has been involved in investing millions and millions of US dollars into real estate developments. This is the guy who talked about Gaza, in the middle of a genocide, as ‘prime real estate,’ ‘seafront properties.’
“So, I think Trump is also going to benefit from bringing a brutal end to the Israeli genocide, and letting real estate developers from New York and other places to go in and invest billions of dollars in the land where Palestinians have been killed by the thousands.”
Such a policy will “create major disruptions across European countries like Germany, Netherlands, France, where there is a sizable population of the Palestinians and other Arab diaspora,” he added.
“There is a considerable segment of Europeans … who have a conscience and who have compassion for the Palestinian people and what they are going through,” he said.
In countries like the UK, Spain and other Scandinavian nations, there has been a “massive outpouring of support for Palestinian people’s liberation,” said Zarni.
Those people and civil society networks and movements are “not going to just simply lie down and let their governments go along with Trump’s authorization or backing of Israel taking over the entire Palestine,” he emphasized.
All these Israeli actions are “openly and blatantly against repeated United Nations resolutions, (UN) General Assembly resolutions that call for a withdrawal from the occupied territories and the removal of all the settlements,” the activist added.
“I think it’s going to create major internal societal upheavals within European society.”
___________________________________________
A Buddhist humanist from Burma (Myanmar), Maung Zarni, nominated for the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize, is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment, former Visiting Lecturer with Harvard Medical School, specializing in racism and violence in Burma and Sri Lanka, and Non-resident Scholar in Genocide Studies with Documentation Center – Cambodia. Zarni is the co-founder of FORSEA, a grass-roots organization of Southeast Asian human rights defenders, coordinator for Strategic Affairs for Free Rohingya Coalition, and an adviser to the European Centre for the Study of Extremism, Cambridge. Zarni holds a PhD (U Wisconsin at Madison) and a MA (U California), and has held various teaching, research and visiting fellowships at the universities in Asia, Europe and USA including Oxford, LSE, UCL Institute of Education, National-Louis, Malaya, and Brunei. He is the recipient of the “Cultivation of Harmony” award from the Parliament of the World’s Religions (2015). His analyses have appeared in leading newspapers including the New York Times, The Guardian and the Times. Among his academic publications on Rohingya genocide are The Slow-Burning Genocide of Myanmar’s Rohingyas (Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal), An Evolution of Rohingya Persecution in Myanmar: From Strategic Embrace to Genocide, (Middle East Institute, American University), and Myanmar’s State-directed Persecution of Rohingyas and Other Muslims (Brown World Affairs Journal). He co-authored, with Natalie Brinham, Essays on Myanmar Genocide.
Tags: European Union, Foreign Policy, Putin, Russia, Trump, USA
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.