Reports of Blackwater Swarming Kiev as East Vows Independence

BALKANS AND EASTERN EUROPE, 19 May 2014

Lauren McCauley – Common Dreams

Following contentious referendum vote, leaders in Donetsk ask Russia to absorb eastern state.

The chasm between western-backed insurgents in Kiev and Russia-aligned populations in eastern Ukraine continues to grow as the Donetsk region has now asked to join Russia, according to reports Monday, following a contentious referendum vote over the weekend.

Hours after final results revealed a 90% majority in Donetsk and 96% in Luhansk voting for state sovereignty, leaders of the self-proclaimed “People’s Republic of Donetsk” have asked Moscow to consider absorbing the Russian-bordering state.

The referendum vote, which the interim government in Kiev has dismissed as illegitimate, was marked by increasing tensions and bloodshed in at least one polling place.

Rumors have begun to circulate that mercenaries contracted by the U.S. firm Academi, formerly Blackwater, have been deployed to Kiev. According to German news source Bild on Friday[9 May 2014], and repeated by Der Spiegel, Ukrainian security forces are being supported by over 100 “elite soldiers” involved in a “punitive operation mounted by Ukraine’s new government.” The information was leaked to the media by sources from German foreign intelligence agency Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND).

Blackwater mercenaries were made infamous during the invasion of Iraq for their frequent and unprovoked massacre of innocent civilians.

Ukraine’s acting president, Oleksandr Turchynov, issued a statement Monday declaring that “the farce which terrorists call the referendum will have no legal consequences except the criminal responsibility for its organizers.”

Unlike Russia’s response to the Crimean referendum in March after which they annexed the Ukrainian peninsula, Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, said in a statement Monday: “In Moscow we respect the will of the people of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions and are counting on practical implementation of the outcome of the referendum in a civilized manner, without any repeat of violence and through dialogue.” However, Lavrov did not indicate when or if new international talks would resume.

Shaun Walker, the Guardian’s correspondent on the ground in Ukraine, writes that, following the vote, “eastern regions [of Ukraine] are entering an uncertain situation, with tension and anger running high on both sides.”

Walker reports that it is “hard to judge” how many people support attempts to separate from Ukraine. However, he notes violence on both sides with the Ukrainian army and “affiliated paramilitary units” increasing attacks against civilians while “rebels in Donetsk have taken hostages among pro-Ukraine activists and been accused of torture.”

___________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

 Go to Original – commondreams.org

Share this article: email mastodon facebook 🔗 copy link

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.