The Word That Cannot Be Uttered (It’s Drones)
ANGLO AMERICA, 27 Apr 2015
Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images
24 Apr 2015 – This is what happens when there is no accountability.
President Obama has chosen to operate his drone war in such unprecedented, absurd and arguably illegal secrecy that even in a rare burst of compelled transparency yesterday, neither he nor his press secretary could actually bring themselves to say the word “drone.”
Over and over again, Obama called the drone strike that killed two al Qaeda hostages a “counterterrorism operation.”
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest at the press briefing:
Q: How will this incident affect specifically the U.S. policy, government policy on usage of drones?
- EARNEST: Well, Jeff, there are certain aspects of this specific operation that I’m not going to be able to discuss, including how this specific operation was carried out …
Q: Can you address the issue of drones, though, in any way? I take it you don’t want to confirm that that’s what used in this particular strike.
- EARNEST: I’m not in the position to talk specifically about how the operation was carried out.
Q: Can you talk, though, about a future review of drone strategy more generally?
- EARNEST: What I can say is that these counterterrorism operations that are critical to the national security of the United States and critical to the safety of the American people continue …
If they cannot even say the word, how can they even begin to tell the truth?
Accountability serves a primary and essential purpose in a democracy. Not to embarrass people who make bad decisions. Not to expose incompetence. (Although those are both common consequences.) It’s so that we don’t make bad decisions in the first place.
When you know your decisions are going to be examined, you make better ones. When your previous bad decisions are exposed, dissected and diagnosed, you make better ones.
When you know the world is looking over your shoulder, you think things through more.
On the third day of his presidency, Obama launched his very first drone strike, in Pakistan, which claimed not a terrorist, but a prominent pro-government tribal elder and four members of his family (including two children).
Theoretically, he imposed new rules after that, calling for higher levels of certainty and requiring his own sign-off. But the January drone strike that killed two al Qaeda hostages evidently did not require or get his approval, and was aimed at a suspicious building whose occupants were not actually known.
Imagine if we’d known about that first strike soon after, rather than learning about it deep inside a book published in 2012?
Maybe none of this would have happened.
Instead, Obama and the political operatives running the White House continue to make life-or-death decisions in a bubble, surrounded by overconfident and overly bellicose men who are so in denial about the fact that they routinely kill civilians that they have created their own reality in which everyone who dies deserved it, and every death helps.
It’s simply unacceptable. At the risk of stressing the obvious:
1) The drone program should no longer be a secret.
2) The rules for engagement should be made public, so there can be a public discussion about them, and how they should be changed.
3) Every bit of information the government has about every past drone strike should be made public, and subject to scrutiny.
The use of drones and cyberattacks mean you can have secret wars now. But secret wars and democracy don’t go together. One has to go.
Articles worth reading if you haven’t already:
- “Drone Strikes Reveal Uncomfortable Truth: U.S. Is Often Unsure About Who Will Die” (The New York Times)
- “A Drone Program That Has Killed Hundreds Of Civilians Finally Killed Some That The White House Regrets” (Huffington Post)
- “Hostages’ deaths raise wider questions about drone strikes’ civilian toll” (The Washington Post)
- “Warren Weinstein and the Long Drone War” (The New Yorker)
- “The United States Needs a Drone Board” (Defense One)
Also on The Intercept:
- When Will Obama Apologize for all the Other Innocent Victims of Drone Strikes?
- The Key War on Terror Propaganda Tool: Only Western Victims Are Acknowledged
- Secret Details of Drone Strike Revealed As Unprecedented Case Goes to German Court
- Germany is the Tell-Tale Heart of America’s Drone War
________________________________
Email the author: dan.froomkin@theintercept.com
Go to Original – firstlook.org
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.