The Hypocrisy of the Religious Slaughter Ban
ANIMAL RIGHTS - VEGETARIANISM, 8 May 2017
The idea of humane slaughter is a myth and a religious slaughter ban cannot end animal suffering. Going vegan can.
Live chickens hang from hooks at a slaughterhouse in Andenne, southern Belgium.
[Francois Lenoir/Reuters]
7 May 2017 – On Friday [5 May], the Parliament of Wallonia in Belgium voted to accept a proposal that would ban all ritual slaughter of animals by 2019. The new law will require small animals – including chicken and sheep – to be electrically stunned before their throats are slit, which some, but not all, believe would contravene the dietary laws of Islam and Judaism, which dictate that animals must be healthy at the time of their death.
In fact, today, many animals slaughtered for the Muslim market in the UK are stunned and certified as halal by some of the many bodies responsible – as long as all other aspects of the slaughter are consistent with Islamic law. Orthodox rabbis have also accepted laws in countries such as Norway and Sweden, where stunning is required.
Conversely, in today’s high-speed, mechanised “conventional” abattoirs, millions of animals are improperly stunned every year and face the fatal incision awake, alert, and terrified. In fact, if you’re buying “conventional” meat – including that touted as “high-welfare”, “organic”, or “free-range” or carrying any other misleading label – there’s no way of knowing whether the animals who were killed for it were fully conscious as their throats were cut open.
There’s no question that animals in abattoirs are absolutely and understandably petrified when chains are shackled to their legs and they’re hoisted upside down into the air. Birds thrash wildly in panic and excruciating pain, since their legs can break under their own weight and may be pulled out of their sockets. Research shows that when cattle and sheep are killed without prior stunning, they may only lose consciousness several unimaginably agonising seconds after their throats are cut. Animals often witness the slaughter of their companions and sense their terror.
Humane slaughter is a myth
In truth, the idea of humane slaughter is a myth and a distraction – because whether animals are stunned and killed or just killed, the final moments of their lives make up only one part of the long and blatantly cruel process of modern meat production. The reality of these practices is an affront not only to Islam’s and Judaism’s teachings of kindness, but also to any decent human being’s most basic sense of right and wrong.
In truth, the idea of humane slaughter is a myth and a distraction – because whether animals are stunned and killed or just killed, the final moments of their lives make up only one part of the long and blatantly cruel process of modern meat production.
Animals slaughtered according to halal regulations come from the same un-Islamic, unhygienic, miserable factory farms as animals killed in standard abattoirs. On factory farms, animals are crammed by the thousands into filthy, windowless sheds, wire cages, crates, and other confinement systems. They’ll never raise their families, root in the soil, build nests, or do anything else that is natural and important to them.
PETA and our international affiliates have released eyewitness footage around the world showing frightened animals who are sexually abused, burned with cigarettes, tormented, and mocked in their final moments.
Even at so-called “organic” abattoirs, video evidence has shown pigs were viciously beaten and kicked by workers. On the way to slaughter, animals are often crammed so tightly into trucks for many agonising hours that they suffocate, get crushed to death, or even freeze during transport in the winter. It’s no wonder that there are numerous accounts of animals that tried desperately to break free on the journey towards their death.
Every single aspect of the mass breeding, farming, and killing of sensitive and intelligent beings goes against the basic principles of compassion and reverence for life shared by virtually all religions.
Going vegan
If the basis of the recent decision in Belgium, which is the outcome of a debate that has also taken place here in Britain and in many other countries, is the belief that cruelty to animals is wrong and that we should act to prevent it, then the only conclusion any of us can reach in good conscience is that we must not only try to legislate against the most egregious cruelty, but also stop supporting industries that are built on animal suffering entirely – by adopting a vegan diet. There’s no passage in the Quran or the Torah – or the Bible, for that matter – that dictates that their followers must eat animals.
OPINION: Eating together and expanding the table
As the daughter of a Belgian-Algerian father who taught me that Islam mandates kindness to animals and that the Quran describes animals as communities and nations unto themselves, not mere resources, I welcome any law that aims to reduce animal suffering while knowing that none of us needs a law to do what’s right.
The meat, egg and dairy industries are hell on earth for animals, and we already have the power to put an end to this misery simply by choosing to eat plant-based meals. And with the vast array of vegan meats and dairy-free milks of all descriptions available today, making kinder dietary choices isn’t just right, it’s also easy.
____________________________________
COUNTING THE COST: Food economics: What if the world went vegan? (26:15)
Mimi Bekhechi is Director of International Programmes at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).
Go to Original – aljazeera.com
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
One Response to “The Hypocrisy of the Religious Slaughter Ban”
Read more
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
ANIMAL RIGHTS - VEGETARIANISM:
Although I am not a vegan yet, I am thinking about going vegetarian. For those who are also thinking about becoming a vegan, the following article might be helpful: https://www.thespruce.com/how-to-go-vegetarian-or-vegan-3378608